Friday, 28 April 2006

Still without books, so here are some links

Lots of film-related comic book news at Empire. I like Favreau, but I’m not sure he has the visual styling to bring Iron Man successfully to life. And, please, please, not Vince Vaughan for Tony Stark. I like Vaughan, but he is not Iron Man.

I hadn’t heard about Edgar Wright handling Ant Man; that sounds a very odd combination. I know he’s a comic book fan, but his sensibility doesn’t match with the standard superheroics of Scott Lang.

I really can’t see Captain America working on film, unless it’s a period piece, but I was never his biggest fan, so I don’t have the emotional investment.

Nick Fury has potential, and has to be better than the Hoff version.

I’m curious about how they will do Thor, as this has the greatest scope for fucking it up. Still, my love for the Simonson era means I would love for it to reach the screen, if they can create his work on celluloid.

Dave has his favourite X-Men team up, which is almost impossible to disagree with, and shows when he started to read superhero comics, although I was never a big fan of Rogue. And, yes, Nightcrawler is the coolest motherfucker on the planet. Not sure about his selection of characters that Dave would write given the chance, though …

This is a list of Jog’s excellent analysis of Seven Soldiers series, that makes me weep with bitter tears at my inadequacy compared with his intelligent critique. Found via ADD's blog.

Finally, because I am a pervert, and because it is funny and well-drawn, the PVP guest strip I can’t seem to quit:

Have a good Bank Holiday weekend; I, on the otherhand, will be sorting out boxes …

Thursday, 27 April 2006

Considering Comic Book News Sites

Apropos of nothing in particular, I was thinking about websites devoted to comic book news. Isn’t the internet great? What did fans do before it was invented? It got me thinking about the variety and the ones I go to first and read.

CBR – Comic Book Resources – is the daddy of for me. It’s the first place I go to in my daily comic book news visits. There are several reasons for this.

One is purely design. The layout of the site is clean and efficient. There are adverts placed strategically on the site, but not obtrusively. There are separate columns for archives on the far left, most recent news items on the left-centre and most recent columns on the right. It is pleasing to look at, doesn’t feel crowded even though it contains a lot and doesn’t hurt the eye with excessive flashing or lurid colours.

The next reason is the regularity of content. Press releases, film-related gossip, previews and interviews are up regularly, not to mention the columns. The columns are another reason for CBR’s dominance, hosting Steven Grant, Augie, Rich, even Warren Ellis for a long while, not to mention a variety of others, from pros like Joe Casey & Matt Fraction, Erik Larsen, Robert Kirkman, to fans like the recently added Buy Pile. All together, an excellent package.

Newsarama is the next click on my bookmarks for comic book news. They complement each other when it comes to the big events like the cons, but also in their approach. CBR is more professional, whereas Newsarama is more relaxed.

I don’t particularly like the layout; the blue reminds me too much of the colour used in the many PowerPoint presentations I’ve had to suffer in my years as a scientist, and the excessive advertising is overwhelming, merrily distracting the hell out of me by flashing away at the top and side, and interrupting the items. The mini-items list on the right seems an afterthought, and the way that the headline for the main items looks like it should be a clickable link, but isn’t, annoys me for some reason.

The variety of items is pretty good, from previews to interviews and now the occasional column, but the one thing alone that takes Newsarama down is the format in which forum posters comment directly under the news item. CBR has forums, but sensibly has links to take you their; Newsarama lets anyone empty their pointless brain nonsense immediately afterwards, which just detracts from the piece immeasurably. Read them at your peril.

The Pulse at Comicon.com also suffers from an unpleasant design; the darkness of the page is offputting, the constant left frame of adverts as you scroll, the blue background, the odd choice of green for titles (both on the main frame and to the right), made even worse by the underlining, something I particularly hate, and the promo text being too close to the title beneath it.

I visit The Pulse only rarely; apart from Warren Ellis’s erratic columns there, I’ve found little to suggest regular repeat viewing, and the presence of headings such as 'What will you be buying?' just smacks a little of desperation. They try to cover a broad spectrum of comic books, which is admirable, if a little scattershot. Jennifer Contino seems to do an good job of getting decent interviews.

The Comics Continuum is a site I used to visit for the occasional titbit and previews, but the advertising put me off and the odd layout (telling you what the pieces for the day are, but you have to click the link for the day to get them all on one webpage, rather than just the pieces you want to see; I understand why they do it that way, I just don’t like it) meant that I gave up going there with no regret.

The Beat by Heidi MacDonald – nice, clean design, well-presented layout, clarity of a blog that links to all sorts of comics-related news in all media. It’s nice to see what is happening in the larger world, but it’s not a site I need to see daily.

There are other sites out there that haven’t become part of my daily reading habits.

The Comics Reporter is in the same blog style as The Beat, and is Tom Spurgeon’s accumulation of comic book news, seemingly sifting through everything in print online, covering a more-academic base of the world of comics, as well as his own perspective on particular aspects of the comic book industry. It isn’t a regular haunt of mine, but it seemingly has a niche in the blogosphere, which must mean something.

Buzzscope has news, but I know it more for the regular items they house, such as Clandestine Chum Greg’s Comics You Should Own, the brilliant interview by Michael Avon Oeming with Warren Ellis, and the hilarious remixes by Tim O’Neill. They seem to try and cover everything, not just comics, including manga, anime, toys, games, music and movies, and this very broad scope applies at each mini-site, making it too much to read (for me, at least).

Broken Frontier is a site I only recently came across. Nicely designed, if a little busy, it seems to have a mix of news, reviews and columns for a nice mix. Further investigation is needed to see if it warrants a regular clicking.

Comic World News is not a site I really know anything about. It has a colourful design, with a mix of news, reviews and a variety of columns, including those of regular bloggers, such as David Welsh (of Precocious Curmudgeon) and Graeme McMillan (who used to bring us the joy that was Fanboy Rampage), and formerly the home of Ed Cunard (The Low Road). Each column has its own icon, which is a nice touch, and the site is well-laid out and easy to navigate, which is something I admire (compare with Newsarama, for example). I shall have to visit more regularly, if just for the columns.

So, have I missed any important sites out? Do you disagree with my choices? Are there too many comic book news sites out there? Do they try to cover too many areas, trying to be all things to all fans? Let me know; because, as should be evident, I like new things …

Wednesday, 26 April 2006

Thinking about masterpiece runs

Greg has a very interesting post at Comics should Be Good about quasi-masterpieces, runs of comics by creators that are defining and the peak of their work. It’s a large subject to discuss, and requires someone with a greater range of comic book history than Greg has, something to which he readily admits.

The post got me thinking about my interpretation of this idea, as it is something that I have been ruminating on recently with regards to my own collection. My Trimming The Collection series was initiated by looking through a couple of boxes of my collection and wondering why I still owned them; the posts examine why I bought them in the first place, why I am removing them from the collection, and hopefully defining what it is I want from my comic book collection. I want to have comics that I simply could not imagine being without; single issues, series and runs that are just plain fantastic comics (as I see them).

X-babiesI can agree with Greg on two of the three he discusses; Claremont & Byrne on The Uncanny X-Men and Peter David’s run on The Incredible Hulk. I would probably include all of Claremont’s run on The Uncanny X-Men, as I didn’t get the original Dark Phoenix saga – I came in at issue 201, meaning the subsequent comics will always have greater resonance for me (for example, the Asgardian crossover makes me giddy with nostalgia just thinking about Art Adam’s renditions of my favourite mutants) – but I realise that I am heavily biased in this area. I’m so subjective on the topic, I’d also include The New Mutants, from when Bill Sienkiewicz started drawing until when Claremont left, which is much harder to defend (except for the Sienkiewicz issues, perhaps).

HulkPAD’s Hulk has a similar link; I came in around the time of the unification of the three Hulk personalities (sheer genius), and the combination of PAD in full swing with Dale Keown and then Gary Frank in those issues are the ones that really do it for me. I can’t comment on the Moench & Sienkiewicz Moon Knight, as I haven’t read them, even though I own them.

ThorHe mentions in passing some other runs which I would also put on the list, Walt Simonson’s The Mighty Thor and John Byrne’s Fantastic Four. Simonson on Thor is wonderful comics, the crackling art matching the stupendous story of an all-action god. Byrne’s FF is probably his best work, redefining the FF for an audience that can’t forget Kirby & Lee (not that I’ve read any of that). So, what about some runs in my collection that I would include on the list?

TransmetGreg mentions another one; Warren Ellis & Darick Robertson on Transmetropolitan. I know I am Ellis’s bitch, but this is a brilliant series. I would mention Authority and Planetary as well, but Transmet is his masterpiece so far.

Garth Ennis & Steve Dillon on Preacher. ‘Mature’ comics done to balls-out perfection. Undiluted joy in sweary violence and theology. I would also include Hitman and Ennis’s run on Hellblazer, which are also excellent comic books.

Animal ManGrant Morrison has too many; Animal Man was a delightful shock to this reader, when Morrison put himself in the book. Doom Patrol was psychedelic superheroes done wonderfully (what about Flex Mentallo?). The Invisibles is unique. Zenith, with Steve Yeowell, is a personal favourite of mine, as it coincided with me getting 2000AD for the first time. Even The New X-Men and the JLA are worthy additions.

ShadePeter Milligan & Chris Bachalo on Shade, The Changing Man was a brilliant use of an old character and completely reinventing it for the author’s own purposes. Enigma, with Duncan Fegredo, may be only 8 issues, but should be mentioned as well.

Neil Gaiman’s Sandman – literary comic books with a flair for storytelling (and the concept of storytelling) that helped to alter my view of the comic book.

WatchmenAlan Moore; well, where do you start? Watchmen, Swamp Thing, Top Ten, Promethea, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, V for Vendetta, From Hell, hell, even Supreme and WildCATS; all amazing, and I’m probably forgetting a whole load of things.

FlashMy love of superheroes means that my collection is spandex-heavy, but hopefully with a twist. Mark Waid’s run on the Flash, particularly the Weiringo-drawn time, when he was really hitting his stride, mixing the science with an almost autobiographical feel.

James Robinson’s Starman, particularly the first half with Tony Harris; the second half, with David Goyer helping out, was never quite as strong.

Priest’s Xero, Quantum & Woody, and Black Panther; comics that you had to read properly, your intelligence not insulted.

Kurt Busiek’s Astro City; a love for superheroes shining through via an angle not investigated before.

Giffen’s Legion of Super Heroes ‘5 years later’ reboot; daring to play with the history and concept of a much-loved team. And what about Ambush Bug, anybody?

Alan Davis’s ClanDestine and his own run on Excalibur; classic superhero comic books with a British flavour.

Usagi YojimboUsagi Yojimbo by Stan Sakai. Black and white brilliance about a rabbit in feudal Japan. A description doesn’t do it anywhere near justice.

I could also include Joe Kelly’s Deadpool, DC Johnson & JH Williams III on Chase, Evan Dorkin’s Milk & Cheese and Dork, Paul Grist’s Kane, but we’re entering a foggier realm.

AliasThis record of my personal definitions doesn’t even include comics collecting now that I think will still hold their own in the future:
100 Bullets, Alias, Barry Ween, Bendis’s Daredevil, Ex Machina, Fables, Waid & Weiringo on the Fantastic Four, Gotham Central, Hellboy, The Losers, Powers, Queen & Country, Runaways, Sleeper, The Ultimates.

I’d better stop, or it will just turn into a inventory of my collection. This is a topic about which I have many (unfocussed) thoughts that can’t be controlled in a quick reactionary post. One of the aspects I always have a problem with is the subjective versus the objective; in many lists, the academic version tends to be a drier recital of ‘approved’ classics, while the fans’ endeavour will be more about the personal, visceral response to material, leading to a more-personal catalogue. This topic bodes well for an interesting discussion.

Tuesday, 25 April 2006

Bring Me The List of Clandestine Critic

The comics are still impossible to access due to the move, so blogging detours to another topoic where the research is provided online – this week’s list of my pulse-pounding purchase:

Tag & Bink: Episode 1 Revenge of the Menace
There can never be enough Star Wars comedy, in my opinion. I know it’s an easy target, but Rubio does it with affection, which is the best way.

Usagi Yojimbo #93Usagi Yojimbo #93
It is always a good week with new Rabbit Ronin to enjoy. How does Stan Sakai keep up the consistency? The quality is impeccable and the stories continue to entertain, intrigue, amuse and keep me absorbed.

Seven Soldiers: Frankenstein #4
Definitely the best of the three latter mini-series; Mister Miracle failed to escape its limitations, Bulleteer was a none-too-startling comment on the obvious (and embarrassing) comic book trope of objectifying women, but Frankenstein was pure fun, with a character that could support a continuing series and an artist in Mankhe born to the job. When the new home is settled, I look forward to reading the whole Seven Soldiers story and seeing how it works as a whole.

Supergirl & the Legion of Super Heroes #17
I had been considering quitting this book, based on the lack of Mark Waid magic in the book and the particularly awful fill-in issue, but I was sucked in by the last panel of the last issue. A classic ‘everything you know is wrong’ change of the status quo, perhaps, but they seem to be going for the full monty, which makes it much more entertaining a prospect.

New Avengers Annual #1
Having enjoyed the first TPB, I decided to keep reading this series. However, the price of the next TPB, Sentry, at $14.99 for four issues seemed to be taking the piss somewhat. Fortunately, I was able to pick up the majority of back issues at a cheap price, so I will be reading them in order once I have a chance to sit down and enjoy them. Also, it has Jessica Jones in this, a character I enjoy, despite being turned into the schmaltzy baby-making machine that usually happens to female characters on sitcoms when they’ve run out of ideas, so I have to get it.

Runaways #15
I've been disappointed with the last few issue of Runaways, which is a surprise as it has been one of the most entertaining books around, making me smile with its light touch and brilliant cliffhangers. I don’t know if it’s just a dip due to Vaughan thinking about other things (Y the Last Man script, perhaps?) but I really hope he turns it around, as this book is too good to just fade away.

X-Factor #6
I may be fussy, but I do miss the Sook art. It helped make the book distinctive. I also didn’t enjoy the women-beating story of the last issue (which didn’t cause as much fuss as Desolation Jones #6, but that might be just me), so I hope Peter David has a strong issue to turn my frown upside down.


Two for the price of one: last week’s pamphlet pleasure (as I couldn’t get to the shop because I was moving home):

Ex Machina Special #1
I hope there is a good reason for having this outside the series (apart from not interrupting the flow of stories for the trade collections; wouldn’t want them to mess up their system …) but can’t complain about having more Ex Machina, and it will be interesting to see the fine pencils of Sprouse on Mayor Hundred.

New Avengers #18
I won’t be reading this just yet (see note above), but I do look forward to it. I’m not an Avengers fan of old, so I have no childhood memories to shatter and abuse, so Bendis can have some fun in the Marvel Universe, accompanied by the talented artists that are working on this book.

Nextwave #4Nextwave: Agents of H.A.T.E. #4
Most anticipated book of the week; Ellis & Immonen are a great team, and this is a pleasure from start to finish. Undiluted explodo joy and superhero mockery.

Squadron Supreme #2
Seemingly, I should have read the mini-series to understand who all the new people were, which didn’t help enjoyment levels. However, it’s good to see this back again, and Gary Frank is on my ‘Artists I Like’ list, so I look forward to seeing story progression at some point.


In events outside my list of comic book purchases, Dave’s X-Men week continues with a look at The Uncanny X-Men #200. This issue means a lot to me because it took me such a long to find the bastard; having discovered the joys of the back issue bins of my then comic shop (Forbidden Planet, in its original location on Denmark Street), I plundered them for old X-Men issues to satiate my growing obsession with Marvel’s merry mutants, but I had to wait years before I found a shop that had this issue, the hole in my collection (and I paid a few quid for it too, which seemed like a fortune for a comic at the time). I agree whole-heartedly with Dave on the ‘Mag-NET-o’ pronunciation issue; ‘Mag-NEAT-o’ makes him sound so limp and childish, and was disappointed to find out that I wasn’t enunciating it the approved way, and had to sound stupid in my head when I read the name. Also, as I mentioned in this post, the purple costume with the opera gloves was a fashion disaster of gargantuan proportions. God, the ‘80s were bad, weren’t they?

Monday, 24 April 2006

So. Tired. Must. Blog.

I’m so exhausted after moving home this weekend, I can barely type. With this in mind, I shall do a little gentle weblogging by deploying some well-chosen links.

Newsarama has a nice intro to The Eternals in preparation for the new mini-series from Neil Gaiman and John Romita Jr. Being only 6-years-old when the original series came out, I have no idea what the Eternals are all about, apart from the words ‘Gods’ and ‘Jack Kirby’, which doesn’t really tell you anything. The article jogged a memory fart, as it included the Walt Simonson-drawn cover to the 12-issue limited series of more recent times. I didn’t pick up the series, obviously, but I do remember the cover because Simonson is one of my top five artists of all time. More information about the Eternals can be found here at Marvel and here at Wikipedia.

Clandestine Chum Greg, wearing his Comics Should Be Good hat, didn’t like Desolation Jones #6. He posts again today, asking why he seems to be the only one who didn’t like it. Despite the spectre of Women In Refrigerators looming over the issue, I didn’t think the comic was bad. On the contrary, I thought it was very good. A story set in the milieu of hard-boiled detective mixed with the bleak end of the espionage genre is not supposed to be happy and fluffy; death is a constant, the randomness, brutality and despair of it being a vital part of it. The characters in the book are not heroes in the strictest sense, nor should they be. The power of Robina’s death is in the fact that she is a fully realised figure who has been crafted into a character about whom we care deeply. Her gender is irrelevant to the power of the story. I’m siding with the likes of Jog and JB on this one; Desolation Jones #6 was a Good Comic. Sorry Greg.

In a perfect world, Dave Campbell would post his comedy reminisces about his comic book collection every day. We don't live in a perfect world, so we make do with his still-regular output. His current themed-week is The X-Men, warming the cockles of my heart; Chris Claremont's run on The Uncanny X-Men is what got me into comics in the first place (see here for my recollections on my first comic), so I have an unhealthy love for those books; therefore, I am more than happy for Dave to take me on a trip down nostalgia lane. His post for today is about a Bill Windsor Smith-drawn Wolverine story from Uncanny X-Men #205, and the tingling has begun already.

Finally, via Johanna, a link to a brilliant turning of the tables – comic book covers if we lived in a matriarchal world. I’m a heterosexual man with lusty appetites, and even I’m embarrassed by the way the female form is depicted in comic books in such a casually sexual way. I’m not talking about the cheesecake stuff; I can enjoy Adam Hughes or Terry Dodson books without worrying too much, because that is what they do. I’m talking about the way seemingly ordinary artists show female characters in a solely sexual and inappropriate manner. For example, I was reading the first trade of Mark Millar’s Crossover storyline in the Ultimate Fantastic Four the other day. There is a panel where Greg Land is supposed to be showing the transition of the Ultimate FF characters to the Zombie FF in a prison cell. The most prominent aspect in the panel at the bottom of the page is the zombie Sue’s backside. Not only is it blatantly gratuitous, it is also diagrammatically incorrect because, in the next panel, Sue is not standing on her own in order to display her perfect bum, but is surrounded by the zombie Thing and Torch. So, three cheers to Karen, the creator of the male sex object covers and for the point they make.

Friday, 21 April 2006

From A Library: The New Frontier Vol. 1

The New Frontier Vol. 1
by Darwyn Cooke

This book wasn’t on my horizons when it first came out, despite the buzz it created around the comic blogging world. Darwyn Cooke was not a creator I had read at all, and the thought of laying down a hefty sum of dosh for something untested was a significant factor.

But the most influential aspect was the appearance of the words ‘Silver Age’ in the promotional blurb. I didn’t get into comics until the mid-80s; comics have been increasing in quality and scope since the Silver Age, and I have neither the interest or the money to discover those comic books, especially when I find the art so stiff and stories so simplistic (in my opinion; your mileage may vary.) The thought of a prestige book devoted to material that has no link to my reading history or interests made me detour around the hype more than anything else.

The only thing that could persuade me to read this, apart from all the glowing reviews from bloggers whose views I respect, was the ability to pick it up without paying for it. I am cheap, I admit it, but I can’t afford to be as experimental as I might have been in my youth. So thank heavens for my excellent local library and their lovely collection of graphic novels. Because this is really rather good.

On beginning to read, I was worried that I didn’t have sufficient knowledge of DC comic books to be able to enjoy the story. I was only aware that The Losers were an existing DC property based on Andy Diggle interviews (I thought his update was an original pitch), and am dimly aware of Task Force X from Suicide Squad. However, the fine line that Cooke treads so deftly is telling a compelling story using extant characters without in-depth knowledge of them to be able to enjoy the narrative, but also providing long-term fans with something so they get a kick out of it. This is bloody tricky, but he pulls it off with aplomb.

Another initial worry was the art; there was a slight blockiness to the characters (and particularly the hands, for some reason) that made me slightly wary. This feeling soon passed (perhaps because the blockiness was deliberate in drawing the war story sections) and Cooke’s art begins to breathe and come into its own. The use of a very structured motif, of three equally spaced, page-wide panels (with the occasional splitting of a single panel in a page in two or three and the sparsely used splash page) gives the story-telling a strong rhythm; this can be seen in small sections, such as J’onn J’onnz acclimatising to Earth by watching television and changing shape to reflect what he is watching – each panel is identical, with the television on the right and J’onn to the left, but it is very funny and surprisingly evocative.

The use of the large panel, effectively the same shape as a cinema screen, gives the book a cinematic feel, which helps. Ironically, I was watching an old tape of Batman Beyond at the same time as reading this, and noticed that Cooke was a storyboard artist for it. Looking at his work, you can see the influence of his original job, using the same style of art (with more of his innate design talent in the mix) and feel of the very cinematic nature of the cartoon. That, and his obvious love for the source material, shines through.

I’d try and explain the story, but my lack of DC knowledge means I am not up to the task. There’s the end of superheroes, the beginning of a new age, rockets, monsters, cameos, real-life people and a lot of fun. Basically, all the things you look for in a comic book. This is a book that actually lives up to the hype, and thoroughly deserves the recommendations and plaudits it earned. I can’t wait for my library to get the second volume …

Thursday, 20 April 2006

Marvel solicitations for July

And now, the Mighty Marvel Mammoth Menu!

(They do a lot of books, don't they?)

Ultimate X-Men #72 – is The Magician the most boring-looking hero you have ever seen? It looks like one of designs that Mike Weiringo puts up on his blog that he did as a child; it's so bland and non-descript. Alarm bells ring when he is described as 'a vital part of the X-Men' when he is a new character; surely the whole point of the Ultimate universe is to update the old characters, not introduce new ones? Or am I being hopelessly naive?

Black Panther #18 has a back-up feature looking 'behind the scenes of the creation of Storm's wedding gown'. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha. Because that's what the superhero fan wants in their 'extras' – or do they seriously think that a vast flock of girls are suddenly going to buy this because it has a wedding in it?

I'm torn in my thoughts about the Civil War crossover; on one side, I don't give a shit and won't be reading any (except for books that I pick up anyway), but on the other hand, I appreciate the effort going into the process, making it a genuine company-wide event, the feeling that this is something that has been considered from a variety of angles by a group of intelligent people who want to tell good stories. Or I could be just losing it in my old age.

The cover for New Avengers #22 – is this the retort to the 'Jessica Jones gets some backdoor loving from Luke Cage' furore? Is this cover seeing Cage getting some unexpected anal attention? It's the only explanation for the expression on his face …

Has anybody been reading the Annhilation thing? I feel a bit sorry for it, being lost amid the hype for Civil War; not that it looks even remotely interesting, but I feel it should fail on its own merits, rather than having the excuse of being overshadowed.

As Brian points out, the idea of Power Pack as grim'n'gritty is a great idea; it's a classic story concept, and reminds me of an old New Mutants' story where they met their older selves, with Sam Guthrie finally able to control both the flight and sound of his cannonballing. I might have to read this one in the shop.

So, is Beyond an update of the first Secret Wars, but on a smaller scale? Isn't that a case of disappearing up their own backside, repeating their own stories from not that long ago?

An indescribably powerful cosmic being gathers nine of Marvel's most mismatched super beings for purposes beyond their comprehension. Can Spider-Man, Gravity, Venom, Henry Pym, The Wasp, Medusa, Kraven, Firebird and the Hood keep from killing each other before they have to face the dangers of their destination, the deadly artificial planet known as Battleworld?
I like the look of Franklin Richards: Son of a Genius – Super Summer Spectacular (see my comments on ridiculously wordy titles for comic books in my post on DC solicitations) but I can't help but wonder if Marvel will get sued by Bill Watterson.

Nextwave: Agents of H.A.T.E – the most accurate promotional copy:
'Superheroes fightingexplosionsex AvengersFinFangFoom giantflyingsubmarine monstrositiesformer X-Forcebabeexplosionskicking MachineManpunching giantevilcoprobotshot Englishchicksecretterrorist organizationsEXPLOSIONS!'

I find it incredibly ironic that both Uncanny X-Men #475 and X-Men 188 are considered 'A perfect starting point for any new reader!'. The most notoriously subplot-dangling titles in the world, more inpenetrable to new readers than anything outside of Legion of Super Heroes, at issues 475 and 188 (not to mention all the mini-series) could hardly be anything less. But I suppose you can't have promotional blurb that says, 'New reader? Fucking forget it!'

Question: Icon comics was set up as a boutique operation for creater-owned comics within Marvel, so who owns the rights (and makes the money) on Jack Kirby's Galactic Bounty Hunters?

And we're done. I'm exhausted. Nothing of particular note for this month; let's hope that Civil War Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (gotta catch 'em all) works out well for Marvel …

Wednesday, 19 April 2006

Image solicitations for July

It's the turn of Image comics, details seen here.

Image has come on a long way, but the promotional blurb can cause strange reactions.

Take the intro for the Bedlam GN: 'It's Blade meets The DaVinci Code in this bold new graphic novella!' I really dislike the 'Hollywood pitch' style of description. It just cheapens the comic, even if it is appropriate. It doesn't help that they have an exclamation mark, a personal bugbear of mine, and calling it a novella at 48 pages – are we going to start calling a double-sized issue of a normal comic a 'novella' now?

The Ride: Chain Reaction makes me sigh – Stelfreeze is a slick artist, with a great style and strong sense of design, but why is he slumming with this?

I wanted to mention Shadowhawk - One Shot #1 only because it has the greatest name of an artist ever: Chance Wolf. That is a brilliant name; it sounds like a superhero. The chap had no choice but to work in comics. I'm amazed nobody has used that name for a character already.

The Art of Greg Capullo HC has the most WTF? description:

"The comic artist's artist!" Ask anyone who knows the medium and that is what they'll tell you about GREG CAPULLO.
Really? REALLY? I haven't seen his art since his X-Force days, so I can't contest the point, but that last sentence seems extremely unlikely at best.

Casanova #2Girls #15Casanova #2 – now that is a cover; even if it is a scantily clad woman, it’s a visually striking image and artistic use of colour and design that makes it art and not smut. Honest.

Girls #15 – 'There are two types of girl. Naked. And not quite as naked. Issue supplied with free tissues.' It might as well have that as the blurb … I mean, come on. And people wonder why comics have a bad name.

Special mention to Mike Hawthorn's Hysteria: One Man Gang, not just for having great gang names (The Giant Midgets and God's Thugs), but for the subtle insertion of a phrase from one of my favourite films, Enter The Dragon: in it, the way that Han delivers the words 'I look forward to a tournament of truly epic proportions' ('troo-lee epp-ik pro-por-shuns', including the pauses) has always stuck in my head, so seeing it here brings a smile to my face.

Witchblade #100Witchblade makes it to issue 100? Wow. Just … wow. How did that happen? Is it because there was a television series? I'm staggered. And this cover; how disturbing is it? Or is it just me? It's just freaky – the biologically unnatural breasts, the impossible buttocks, the spine twisting, the creepiness of the character on the right. I stare at it and can't believe what I'm seeing; it's hypnotic in its awfulness …

I've just noticed; all these covers show women in various states of undress; does that suggest something about me?

Final mention goes to the Witchblade Compendium Edition; 1248 pages of full colour for $49.99. I may not care for the material, but that's one hell of a bargain – 50 issues in one enormous book.

Tuesday, 18 April 2006

DC solicitations for July

I'm in the process of moving, so my comics are inaccessible at the moment. Which means that the list of future comics that hit the web are the perfect fodder for blogging; I am required to post my opinions as a comic blogger, and all the research material is right to hand.

Let's take a look at DC Comics:

(I was rather suprised to discover that DC Comics took the name only relatively recently; I always thought they'd been called that from way back. Not so; they'd been National Periodicals for a long time. I learnt this from reading Gerard Jones's book, Men of Tomorrow: Geek, Gangsters, And The Birth Of Comic Books, which is a great read, informative and entertaining. Not perfect, but a valuable addition to the library.)

The excitement this month, for me, is in Grant Morrison doing Batman (fnarr, fnarr). His Dark Knight in his JLA run was the best interpretation of Bats yet, for my money, so his taking over the writing of a regular series is a perfect fit and a great idea. However, I have no great rush to get these in singles; you know this is getting the trade treatment, and the Kubert art, while technically accomplished and rather snazzy, has never done anything for me (which is going against the grain of public opinion, apparently).

Secrets #5Batman: Secrets #5 – is it me, or does the cover looks like someone is going down on the Dark Knight, to give him a little oral vigilantism? Is that what the secret of the title is? Batman accepts blow-jobs for justice? I can't decide the gender of the fellator; the pink is ambiguous, perhaps deliberately. I initially thought that it was an attempt to overcome the blatant homoeroticism in superhero covers; apart from having Bats vigorously taking Selina from behind on the bonnet of the Batmobile, this is about as blatant as you can get. However, if the person about to take a shot of Dark Knight shake in the mouth is a man, it would be in keeping with the undeserved reputation that Wertham gave the Caped Crusader.


Battle for Bludhaven #6Freedom Fighters #1Crisis Aftermath: Battle for Bludhaven #6 (what a mouthful; no wonder they have to leave so much room at the top of the cover for the title. Where will it end? Covers with just words on them? What are we – 'normal' books?) and Uncle Sam and the Freedom Fighters #1 (even with ideas from GM, this just looks like a failure) have very nice Acuna covers; they radiate superhero power and a modern fashion-consciousness sets them apart, and he has a smooth touch to his linework, sort of like a slightly jazzier Adam Hughes. I wonder what he’s like with a story?

Superman #654The other big news is Busiek & Pacheco on Superman as of issue 654; that is a salivating combination. I’m drooling on my keyboard as we speak – I hope it doesn’t short-circuit. And I’m not even a great Supes fan. I always thought Busiek would do a good Superman after his first Astro City story. This was confirmed when I read Superman: Secret Identity, which was wonderful. Match him with an artist of the calibre of Pacheco, who is modern yet steeped in classical superheroism, and you’ve got the perfect combination.

This Crisis (much like the last) seems to be introducing new superheroes willy nilly – a new Blue Beetle, a new Spectre, a new Catwoman (hilarious cover)Catwoman #57, a new Nightwing (great cover by Jock) – and now an ‘All-New Atom’. Do we think that people will warm to new versions of their old favourites? Has Firestorm gone down well? I’m not so sure; I think we’ve passed the threshold where people would try new stuff, and now people just want their favourites in place – look at the fuss when Hal Jordan wasn’t Green Lantern, and the efforts made to return him to the job.

Jack of Fables – lovely cover, but do we need it? Do spin-offs really work? The presence of a co-writer makes me slightly nervous; it shows the opportunism involved, rather than the vision of one person requiring the extra space to tell stories. I am willing to be proved wrong, as I enjoy Fables immensely, but I’ll be picking this up in trade if I do at all.

Thursday, 13 April 2006

From A Library – Elektra: The Scorpio Key

Elektra: The Scorpio Key
Brian Michael Bendis & Chuck Austen

I recently saw the Elektra film on DVD; the film was dull, but the accompanying documentary on comic book writers and artists who had worked on Elektra was far more interesting. Hell, just seeing Frank Miller, Brian Michael Bendis, Greg Rucka and Bill Sienkiewicz in the flesh was worth the rental. The reason I mention this is that Bendis said in that documentary that he only took on the job because he had an Elektra story to tell. I can only assume he meant The Scorpio Key, because I’m not sure this book is what he had in mind when he decided to overcome his initial aversion to writing the character, so dull and lifeless is the tale that unfolds.

I won’t bore you with too many details, as I want to keep you reading my blog, but it basically involves SHIELD getting Elektra to go to Iraq and kill someone and pick up a ‘thing’, which turns out to be the Scorpio Key. It might sound like it has the constituents to make an exciting espionage thriller, but that’s not what happens. And it certainly doesn’t feel as if it requires the character of Elektra in order for it to be told, which kind of misses the point. Why use Elektra, a character that should stay in the past, in a generic spy/action narrative?

The story meanders rather than whips; Bendis is known for his dialogue, and it can be good, but people sitting around, either outside or in darkened rooms, is not really what Elektra should be about. Based on the stories that Bendis has been telling in the Marvel Universe, from the obscenely tardy Secret Wars to the New Avengers, suggests he has a huge hard-on for spies stories, Nick Fury and SHIELD in particular (and this is without mentioning his early indie work, Fire; it’s hard to believe they are both written by the same guy at times). However, that urgency for the genre doesn’t equate to any passion here, leaving you bored and flicking through the book with not much enthusiasm.

What kills the book stone dead is the hideously flat art from Chuck Austen. To quote the documentary again, Bendis said that another reason for doing the story was seeing the great computer art that Austen was using. You what? Are we talking about the same art here? Blandness bleeds from each page like slime from a beaker in a mad scientist’s laboratory in a ‘50s B-movie. Everything is so static, even the action shots. The characters all look like Action Man figures and Barbie dolls being posed badly and poorly photographed before being manipulated inexpertly in Photoshop. It’s like being weakly slapped around the face with an old cushion by your gran after Christmas dinner; not what you want, and it gets annoying after a while. The ultimate insult is the ‘Nuff Said chapter included at the end of the book, a silly marketing stunt where there is no, or minimal, dialogue in the issue. In what is a poorly choreographed, extended fight scene, which ends up with Elektra showing off her scars to bring the fight to a conclusion, you feel cheated at paying for this rubbish. I’m glad I read it for free, or I’d be pissed off.

Wednesday, 12 April 2006

Q&A: Nightcrawler

NightcrawlerKurt Wagner was born in Bavaria with indigo fur covering his body, a prehensile tail, three fingers on each hand (including opposable thumbs), fang-like canines, and yellow eyes with no distinguishable pupils. Naturally, a career in the circus beckoned. He was invited to join the X-Men by Professor Charles Xavier, due to his mutant ability to teleport. He led the X-Men briefly, as well as the British offshoot, Excalibur, where his sense of fun and chivalry played a central role. He is a devout Catholic.

What is your idea of perfect happiness?
A lovely lady to rescue from peril, then a hot tub and some champagne …

What is your greatest fear?
Alopecia areata universalis (complete loss of hair on whole body)

Which living person do you most admire and why?
Professor Xavier; he is a brilliant man with a noble dream.

What is your greatest extravagance?
Wearing a dashing and classic costume, despite being covered in fur.

What do you most dislike about your appearance?
Absolutely nothing – I am perfect in every way!

Who would play you in a movie of your life?
Me!

What is your most unappealing habit?
Filing my fangs.

What is your favourite smell?
Sulphur.

What is your favourite word?
Liebchen.

What is your fancy dress costume of choice?
Who needs a fancy dress costume? If I had to, I would set the image-inducer to Errol Flynn.

Radiator or air conditioning?
I don’t need a radiator, I can assure you.

Cat or dog?
Neither; fur is too much of a problem already.

Is it better to give or to receive?
Give, give, give.

What or who is the greatest love of your life?
A gentleman never kisses and tells.

Which living person do you most despise and why?
It is not Christian to hate; we must learn to forgive people.

Have you ever said 'I love you' without meaning it?
Never. A real man would never do that.

Which words or phrases do you most overuse?
Ja. Unglaublich! Wunderbar! Fantastisch! Nicht warr? Mein Gott!

When and where were you happiest?
The circus, as a child, were wonderfully innocent and happy times. Due to the high level of angst running through the mutant books, I am not contractually allowed to be happy for very long.

How do you relax?
Fencing and praying.

What single thing would improve the quality of your life?
Quick-drying fur products.

What do you consider your greatest achievement?
It used to be becoming a priest, but apparently that didn’t happen. So, I’d have to say it was leading the X-Men and Excalibur.

What keeps you awake at night?
Rolling onto my tail.

What song would you like played at your funeral?
Sympathy for the Devil.

How would you like to be remembered?
As the Fuzzy Elf.

What is the most important lesson life has taught you?
Don't judge a person by appearances.

(Kurt Wagner was always my favourite of the X-Men. I can't mock him too much.)

Tuesday, 11 April 2006

Sky High, secret identities and sidekicks

Sky HighI got around to seeing Sky High on DVD on the weekend, and thoroughly enjoyed it. I’d heard nice things about it, but you can never tell until you see it for yourself. It is not a groundbreaking film in anyway – it is a coming-of-age story, formulated exactly to scriptwriting rules of acts and story beats, only with superheroes – but it is the sort of ‘light but entertaining’ film that should be made more often, rather than the dross that is produced by the bucket load and dumped on a gullible public.

It is a very straightforward tale, where you know exactly what is going to happen and when, but is enjoyable nonetheless, made with a lightness of touch and humour that the flat Fantastic Four film could only imagine. The son of the two most famous superheroes – The Commander (Kurt Russell) and Jetstream (Kelly Preston) – has yet to develop his own powers, yet is starting high school for kids with superpowers. There are familiar ideas and story beats: Will, the son, has a female friend who loves him but who he ignores for the foxy female (Gwen Grayson – what a lovely bit of comic book in-jokery there) until he realises the truth about her; he is initially friends with the sidekicks (a nice touch on the jock/nerd split is the hero/sidekick filter that is based on your power – a funny scene with Bruce Campbell as Coach Boomer separates them at the start of school) but becomes a hero when his powers kick in, at the dramatically necessary moment, leaving his friends behind when he becomes popular, only to realise who his friends are; the lame powers of the sidekicks all come into play to save the day when the supervillain makes their move and Will has come to his senses; as well as superpower-based versions of isolation, coming out to your parents, bullying, friendship, living up to your parents’ dreams, among others.

Mix this in with a gentle mocking of superhero standards, such as sidekicks themselves, with Dave Foley as a teacher in the school who was formerly All-American Boy, The Commander’s sidekick, or the science villain with the large head (Kevin McDonald as Mr. Medulla), a nice cameo from Lynda Carter as the principal, and some nice one-liners ('You know how my mom can talk to animals? Yeah, well, apparently they don't like being eaten.' Or Boomer persuading Medulla to come on a double-date, 'Did I mention she's not just a twin, but an evil twin?') and you have the formula for a fun movie that leaves you smiling. I can’t believe it’s from the director who gave us Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo.

It also got me thinking about some aspects of comic book trappings used in the film. The casual use of the secret identity is one. They have The Commander and Jetstream as realtors, and apparently successful ones at that.

Superman & ClarkEver since Superman (or Zorro, if we go back further), we’ve had the concept of the secret identity. It apparently played a big part in Identity Crisis (I’m guessing, based on the name; I certainly haven’t read it) and will play a big part in Marvel’s Civil War, so it is something that is very much a part of the foundations of superheroes. However, I’ve never had much use for the idea.

Perhaps because I came into comics via 2000AD here and the X-Men from American comics, but the concept feels like deadweight to me. I don’t read Spider-man, perhaps because of the continuing angst about the secret identity putting loved ones in trouble. I never cared for the Clark–Lois–Superman triangle, a convention that is kept by tradition more than for interesting stories. Superman should be about more than whether Lois can love the human pretense. It just rings of cheap melodrama, which is not what I want to read about in comics.

I read superheroes for the awe-inspiring ideas and interesting characters, not their alter egos. Looking back through my collection, I’ve enjoyed superhero comics that got rid of the notion: the X-Men, obviously; the Walt Simonson Thor run, where the whole Donald Blake identity was removed; the fusing of Bruce Banner and the Hulk in the Peter David run; James Robinson’s Starman, where he doesn’t even bother with it; the Fantastic Four, with no need for it at all; Mark Waid’s Flash run, where Wally is Flash, and vice versa; Priest’s Black Panther; even something like The Authority, if I’m to stretch my point. I’m not saying that all comics with the idea in it are bad – that would discount a lot of great comics, such as Watchmen, which would be stupid – but I will need a lot more proof to dissuade me.

Another comic book tradition used in Sky High, more for comedic results, is the sidekick. I can understand that the whole idea is for the kids, representing their dreams of being pals with their superhero idol, but I just think it is stupid. Not for the reasons of Wertham homophobia or fears of child abuse, but from a conceptual point of view. A young sidekick is an inherently unfeasible idea, from a physical standpoint (how does a teenager defeat a strong, vicious, unstable adult?) and psychologically as well (how mentally unbalanced is someone who thinks that they can be the sidekick of superhero? Isn’t that what The Incredibles taught us?).

Shit filmIt didn’t help that I saw the tail end of the utterly execrable Batman & Robin the other day, which brings into sharp focus the dynamic. Batman works as a concept because he is psychotically driven to do what he does, and has spent years training his body to the peak of physical perfection, as well as having tons of money and a keen deductive brain. There is no way that he would say to teenager with some gymnastic skills, 'Here, dress up in this nipple costume and fight insanely violent individuals, especially as you have no martial art training, weapons or legal validity.' Also, with Alicia Silverstone, 'Young girl, niece of my butler, you have no vital skill set in becoming an urban vigilante, nor a reason to fight crime; please put on this form-fitting costume and put your life at risk because girls need a role model too.'

Even if you allow for the possibility of superpowers, it is an unpleasant notion to completely alter a young person’s existence to the extent that being a superhero would. Sky High recognises the fact that it is an inherently silly idea by having Dave Foley play a former sidekick, now old and grey and moustached, who still dresses up in his silly costume. An alternative opening to the film showed the first meeting between The Commander and Jetstream, where The Commander and Al- American Boy are captured by Royal Pain. Dave Foley is ‘younged-up’ to play the role, and it looks slightly disturbing, seeing him next to the more buff (and more believable) Kurt Russell, as well as being slightly creepy. Correctly, they got rid of this original beginning, cute as it was, because it gives too much away about later plot developments, allows us to come to the story at the appropriate moment, and means that the first time we see Foley, it is for comedy, seeing a former sidekick trying to relive his glory days, despite the fact that The Commander doesn’t even mention him.

Wow, that was a long ramble over a Disney film. In summary: Sky High – good; secret identities and sidekicks – mostly bad.

Monday, 10 April 2006

Considering Current Comics

Apart from getting rid of old comics (Trimming the Collection), reading a variety of stuff I wouldn’t buy (From A Library), and being silly (Q&A), I do actually buy comics as they come out. Shocking, I know. Since starting a new job that is in the opposite direction from my comic shop and home, I don’t get to buy them on a weekly basis. Therefore, in a startling new feature here at Clandestine Critic, I review some of my recent comic book purchases.

All-Star Superman #3All-Star Superman #3
Utterly charming. Grant channels his love of the old Superman stories through a modern sensibility without being twee or corny. Not being a Superman reader, I had no idea if Samson and Atlas are regulars in the cast, but I didn’t care and didn’t need to know; this is how comics should be. Apart from a couple of ropey panels, Frank’s art is lovely (Zilla nails it with the perfect panel) and captures the mood beautifully. Left me with a grin on my face and warm sensation in my cockles, or perhaps the sub-cockles. This is despite my current reading of Men of Tomorrow by Gerard Jones and the treatment of comic book creators.

Ex Machina #19
Politics continue as Ex Machina emphasises the job of Mayor over Machine in this issue. I think that most people would be surprised to find themselves reading a comic book about what it is like to be Mayor of New York, but Vaughan makes it engaging and Harris’s art makes it feel real and engaging. I feel that I enjoy this more because I’m British, viewing New York from the point of view of fascinated onlooker, so don’t have any real familiarity with the source material.

Planetary #25
In which things are explained. Ellis’s dialogue, with its bare-bones approach yet information-laden effect, results in superhero poetry, and Cassaday’s art sings as always. Despite the hideous wait, each issue is well worth it, the consequence of a wonderful comic book by all involved. It will be a shame when it has to end.

PvP #25
I enjoy Scott Kurtz’s gaming magazine sitcom, even if I find myself enjoying it more on the computer screen than the printed page; seeing it on paper highlights the lack of background and artistic perspective in the artwork, leaving it to the facial expressions and the writing to carry the load. The collection this issue wasn’t the strongest, and the duplication of a strip on the same page seemed a little insulting to the paying audience.

Usagi Yojimbo #92Usagi Yojimbo #92
An ‘in-between’ story, as Usagi & Tomoeh cross paths with Kitsune, the wandering entertainer/thief, and her young charge. Even small stories are wonderful in Usagi, with Stan Sakai consistently bringing quality comics. This is leading up to the next issue, with the tea ceremony between Usagi & Tomoeh, who deserve to be a happy, romantic couple, but the samurai code looks set to intervene. It’s far too long to wait until the next issue.

I also bought Queen & Country #29, as I have been buying it in singles since it began, but I can’t bring myself to read it yet. This is because it relies on what has happened in the Rucka-penned novels, A Gentleman’s Game and Private Wars. I have yet to buy these because I don’t buy hardback books; it was only through researching for this post that I discovered that the first book is in paperback. (I don’t like buying hardbacks. It seems an expensive and storage-intensive manner to own a book. The only hardback I have bought is my copy of The Art of Usagi Yojimbo. Yes, I know I am odd.) So, do I read the comics and spoil the novels? This seems a shame, as I really enjoy Rucka’s novels; I have his Atticus Kodiak books, and they are great. I am on the horns of a dilemma. What to do? The agony of choice.

Friday, 7 April 2006

Q&A: Black Bolt

Black BoltBlackagar Boltagon is King of the Inhuhmans Royal Family, as well as being a member of The Illuminati. Subjected to mutagenic Terrigen Mist while still an embryo, he was born with an array of powers, such as speed, flight, strength and endurance, but it is the capacity of his vocal chords to turn any sound into a correlative destructive force that requires his vow of life-long silence. He is married to Medusa, his cousin, and they have one child, Ahura. This interview was conducted by email.

What is your idea of perfect happiness?
Silence.

What is your greatest fear?
Whooping cough; I'd probably obliterate the moon ...

Which living person do you most admire and why?
Eminem; he's a fucking poet.

What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
Always having to have the last word.

What is the trait you most deplore in others?
Taciturnity.

What has been your most embarrassing moment?
Farting in the sound-proofed chamber.

What vehicles do you own?
I don't need no car, bitch ...

Where would you like to live?
Attilan. Why do you think I keep relocating and building it?

What do you most dislike about your appearance?
This damn tuning fork.

Who would play you in a movie of your life?
Ben Affleck. He could knock it outta the park. He's got the gravitas, you know?

What is your most unappealing habit?
Picking my nose.

What is your favourite smell?
Terrigen mists. Perverse, I know.

What is your favourite word?
Cacophony.

What is your fancy dress costume of choice?
You're looking at it, baby; the blue threads are a classic.

Cat or dog?
Lockjaw, all the way.

What is your guiltiest pleasure?
Singing in a specially sound-proofed shower.

What or who is the greatest love of your life?
My sweet and lovely Medusa.

Have you ever said "I love you" without meaning it?
Have I ever said anything without meaning it?

Which words or phrases do you most overuse?
You're just taking the piss now ...

What single thing would improve the quality of your life?
A change in the laws of physics regarding the carrying of soundwaves.

How would you like to be remembered?
As a good king, a good husband and a good man. Without a tuning fork on his head.

What is the most important lesson life has taught you?
Silence is golden.

(The questions have changed slightly from previous post, due to finding out the full list of official questions the Guardian uses from this post by Neil Gaiman, who recently answered them for publication.)

Thursday, 6 April 2006

My printed letters of comment – Usagi Yojimbo #73


This letter is my most recent; my other letters were all around the same time, about 8, 9 years ago (damn, I feel old …). That was my concentrated letter-writing time, where I was writing pretty regularly to comic books. I don't think I was a hack – I didn't write more than around twenty letters all told – although I did, subconciously, write with the intent of getting my letter published, rather than just saying nice things about the book. I tended to write to comics with smaller readerships, I tried to write something positive and thoughtful, and I was fairly regular when I did write.

My letter-writing days didn't last too long, what with the increased emergence of the internet, especially interactive forums, for that feedback we crave. So, I haven't written a letter since that heady time. Except for this one last year. Again, I cheated a little bit, aiming for a book that doesn't have huge numbers, despite it being brilliant, and used the classic hack technique of asking a question that might need to be answered, in this case about the selling of original artwork.

I was particularly pleased to have my letter printed in Usagi Yojimbo for several reasons: it is one of my favourite comic books, and I am now part of its long history; it has many letters from the brilliant and most erudite of regular letter writers, Charles J Sperling (I wish he wrote a blog), which gives me undeserved recognition; I only wrote two letters to Usagi, with one getting published, which is a pretty good average; and because I mentioned my girlfriend and her love of Usagi in it as well – she is a complete Usagi fiend, and I have to stop her buying all the trades, despite having all the singles, everytime we go comic book shopping.

And now, I have this blog, where I can write whatever the hell I want about anything I want, which is just as good, if still not quite as cool as seeing your name and thoughts printed in the back of a comic book you love.

Wednesday, 5 April 2006

My printed letters of comment – Transmetropolitan #7


Tranmet letter pt1(Apologies for the two images – the letter was printed over two pages, and my limited Photoshop skills couldn’t seamlessly blend them together again, even with help from all the King’s horses AND all the King’s men, useless bastards.)





Having a letter printed in a comic book is great, in my opinion. So, all my letters printed are special to me. But I think that this one edges out by an angstrom unit in its specialness.

There’s the fact that it’s in a Warren Ellis comic, compounded by the fact that it’s Transmetropolitan, Warren’s best work. He has created many great comics, from Planetary to Authority to Fell to Desolation Jones, but this is his masterpiece. Spider Jerusalem was the perfect conduit for all the ways in which Ellis is a great writer, and Darick Robertson was brilliant throughout the entire series. And I got a letter in it. Also, it was in reaction to the first issue, so it got in on the ground floor, so to speak.

There were also other bonuses. This letter got an immediate email reply from Stuart Moore, the editor (or whorehopper), saying how it reminded him of the way he felt about New York. That was pretty cool, in my limited world experience. Also, in another letter I wrote (but didn’t get published, I’m not greedy), I think it might have been about issue 6, I made mention of how Darick’s art didn’t look as good as normal. I got a reply from Darick thanking me for noticing how all his hard work had been muddied by the inker. That was also pretty cool.

Finally, there was just the visceral response of the emotion in the letter. Tranmet #1 was a cracking book, and I just poured out my reactions, barely any editing, and this immediacy found its way into the very book it was praising. This connection to the books we read is one of the many great aspects about the world of comic books, and this one gives me a sense of time and place, kept forever in series I adore. All in all, that’s a good feeling.

Tuesday, 4 April 2006

My printed letters of comment – XERØ #9


Another letter in a comic book, another comic book by Priest. XERØ was a wonderful series that was criminally cut short due to poor sales and woeful treatment by the power people at DC – for a personal reflection on the many travesties poured on this book, read this piece written by Priest, which is depressing but fascinating.

Trane Walker, a black man, was the top spy in an agency who dressed as a white guy for his jobs. That summary does the series no justice, as it was wonderfully complex in that fantastic Priest way, mixing real-world politics, family tensions (his brother was his handler at the agency), pro basketball and action (or what Trane called, 'the cowboy thing'). It just happened to star a black man.

Although race was a part of the book, it was not the sole and defining aspect, and it was a great read with some great CrissCross art. It was a unique book that deserved so much more, and I was so proud to have a letter printed in it, especially after finding out what went on behind the scenes. A recent meme, picked up by JB, was Five Comics You Were Sad To See Go Away; in my list, which would include the JB-nominated Chase, XERØ would be top.

Monday, 3 April 2006

My printed letters of comment – Quantum & Woody #9


Quantum & Woody was THE most enjoyable thing to come out of Acclaim. Priest wrote some hilarious stuff, MD Bright drew up a storm, and much fun was had by them and the readers, unfortunately not that many. I enjoyed it so much, I bought the trades as well as the singles, which is the highest award I can give a book.

Getting a letter printed here was, therefore, rather special, even if I was being used as a token Brit, not that I gave a monkey's. I stand by all that I wrote in the above, and will eulogise it for a long time to come. Priest is another writer I admire, and this is one of his best works. It was a crying shame that Acclaim stopped publishing, as I wanted this to go on forever.

The coolest by-product of this letter was receiving a preview copy of Concrete Jungle: Legend of the Black Lion, also by Priest, that was sort-of spinning out of Q&W. Never having received a preview before (or since), this was particularly gratifying. It was made even more singular by the fact that it was never published, due to the previously mentioned Acclaim meltdown. That Priest is so unlucky … It was an interesting looking book, which would have been more Priest goodness in the world, but it was not to be.

Sunday, 2 April 2006

Green Wing – series 2, episode 1


Green Wing was a breath of fresh air on Channel 4 last year. Inventive, surreal, visually distinctive, populated with great comedy actors, backed by good writers, and experimenting by doing comedy in an hour-long show, rather than t