Wednesday, 31 May 2006

Comics That Are New and Episodes That Are Who

New Comics! They want me to buy them, the little minxes!

Runaways #16
I’m not sure if the second series has been as strong as the first. Perhaps it was because it was a more-complete story, I’m not sure, but it hasn’t hit the highs that the first run did. I could be blinkered. I’m hoping that Vaughan brings some magic (and his cliff-hanger fun) to stop me from becoming so jaded.

Queen & Country #30
Well, would you Adam’n’Eve it? Queen & Country as a regularly published comic book. I haven’t read the novels that supposedly come in the middle here, so don’t know if I will be able to read this until I have, but I will buy the comic because (A) I enjoy it immensely and (B) it is a b&w book from an indie publisher that needs the support.

-------------------------------

As that was a shorter poster than I had hoped, a few thoughts on last week’s Dr Who episode, The Idiot’s Lantern.

A bit silly, but fun.

Well, I had better write more than that.

It was a nice idea of having the television as a vehicle of evil on a television show, especially at a time when it was just finding its feet. There were some nice lines, as would be hoped from one of the League of Gentlemen stars/writers. Talking of Mark Gatiss, I wondered if the Tom character was a bit of author substitute, allowing him to be part of the Who mythos, with the intelligent but sensitive nature, the ‘Mummy’s boy’ jibing for homosexuality, and getting to save the day. No complaint, just an observation. Another enjoyable aspect was the absence of Piper from much of the episode, making for nice change and a relief to both eyes and ears, as I still find her tremendously annoying. Tenant trys to be unexpectedly menacing, but he doesn’t quite reach the necessary mix of threat and wild-eyed madness. Will he have the breakdown of the lonely god? Will it be due to not regenerating properly in the Christmas episode? We shall see.

Tuesday, 30 May 2006

No comics, no film, no such thing as bad publicity, no more Ninth Art

A wedding in Wales on the weekend means that I couldn’t get to the comic shop to buy the huge number of books waiting for me. It also meant that I couldn’t get to see X-Men 3, a film I obviously want to see due to my formative years as a fan of the Claremont mutants, even if Brett Ratner at the helm doesn’t film me with anticipation. A handful of fellow bloggers saw the film, but I can’t read their posts yet, as my geekiness won’t allow for spoilers.

----------------------------------------------

The big news to hit is the Batwoman story. Looking over somebody’s shoulder at the Metro, the free newspaper found at tube and rail stations, I could see it was on their page 3, where they put a comedy news item, so that was rather typical. When it appears as an item on the BBC website, you know it’s real. (The BBC item is rather well written, and shows someone did their homework, rather than dismissing it.) Personally, I don’t know what the big fuss is, but maybe that’s because I’m not a huge DC fan (in both senses of the phrase). Anything that gets a bit of news for comics is always good, even if it sounds silly. As long as the stories are good, the attention-grabbing tactics can be ignored. We shall wait and see.

----------------------------------------------

Unfortunately, there is sad news today; Ninth Art have announced they will be closing shop after five years of producing quality articles about all aspects of the comic book world. Intelligent, well written, funny and informative, my Mondays will be less for not seeing new content from the people at Ninth Art, who were articulate, thoughtful, amusing and passionate about comics.

----------------------------------------------

Finally, from the Comic Foundry blog, CulturePulp preps you for the difference between X-Men the books and the films.

Friday, 26 May 2006

Q&A: Cannonball

At puberty, in common with other mutants coming into their powers, Sam Guthrie developed the ability to fly, via the release of thermochemical energy, which also makes him invulnerable while flying. After becoming the co-leader of the New Mutants, he also joined X-Force, before becoming an X-Man, then joining X-Corporation, before coming back to the X-Men, because you can never get enough X. He has been romantically linked to Lila Cheney, the rock star (with the ability to teleport over galactic distances), and owns his own farm.

What is your idea of perfect happiness?
Fighting the good fight.

What is your greatest fear?
Claustrophobia.

Which living person do you most admire and why?
Professor Xavier, for his dream and what he has done for me.

What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
Stupidity.

What is the trait you most deplore in others?
Thinking ah'm stupid 'cos of mah accent.

What has been your most embarrassing moment?
Well, there was this one time that involved Lila getting me into a public nudity situation ...

What vehicles do you own?
Mah mutant power is mah vehicle.

Where would you like to live?
Back home in Kentucky. Beautiful country and wonderful people.

What do you most dislike about your appearance?
Ah'm too gangly; ah hoped ah'd have filled out by now.

Who would play you in a movie of your life?
This may be vain, but ah think Paul Walker would be a good choice.

What is your most unappealing habit?
Blushing.

What is your favourite smell?
Fresh air.

What is your favourite book?
Gosh, what can ah pick? Anything by Heinlein, ah guess.

What is your guiltiest pleasure?
Air miles.

Which living person do you most despise and why?
Cable; let's not go there ...

Have you ever said 'I love you' without meaning it?
No, it's not a gentlemanly thing to do.

What has been your biggest disappointment?
Finding out that ah may or may not be an immortal Eternal.

When did you last cry, and why?
Ah'm not ashamed to admit to crying recently, but ah can't remember why.

What do you consider your greatest achievement?
Becoming an X-Man.

How would you like to be remembered?
Fondly.

What is the most important lesson life has taught you?
Empty vessels make the most noise.

Thursday, 25 May 2006

Good Blog Comes Good

Good news, everyone! Comics Should Be Good is now part of the CBR family. Congratulations to the chaps at CSBG; they are one of the most interesting, consistent and genial blogs around, especially as they are a large group blog. I started reading them when the prolific Greg Burgas started writing for them (have you seen how much he writes on his own blog, Delenda Est Carthago? Where does he find the time?), and the site has been a regular ever since.

It is an interesting development – is this the future for comic blogs? Becoming assimilated into the larger news sites? The redesign for CSBG is very nice, improving on their very basic original Blogger template no end, and CBR hosting should mean a solid footing on the web, not having to suffer the blips that Blogger users have to suffer. Will the link to a site that makes money have any affect? Do the people feel different now that the site is run (not owned?) by CBR? Will the ads become annoying? (Probably not.)

It’s nice if the bloggers there pick up a little bit of change when people click on links; a small reward for hard work, even if that wasn’t the reason they did it in the first place. Not having the blogspot name at the end must be nice; there are certain sites where one forgets that it is hosted for free via Blogger (Diamond Geezer, or the low-end design but high-quality content of Dave’s Long box, for example), but should the owning of the name and domain be the ultimate goal? Or is it a by-product of success? Or a personal desire to own the name of your own site? I’ve often thought about it myself, but worry that my lack of knowledge will screw it up; having someone else responsible for the techy side was always one of the attractions of starting up on Blogger.

I look forward to continued quality from the CSBG team, and feel a small twinge of jealousy for their good fortune and their talents and drive that force them to continually produce and share their passion for comics.

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

Comics on my shopping list (if I make it to the shop ...)


Pulse-pounding Periodicals for Perusal!

Supergirl and the Legion of Super Heroes #18
I’m still intrigued by the 'Supergirl thinking it’s all a dream' concept, which has shook things up quite nicely. I still have faith in Waid, although it faltered a little in the middle of this run, so I hope I’m not piling on the expectations.

PvP #26
I still enjoy Kurtz’s gaming magazine sitcom, for all its geeky references. I read the preview of Truth, Justin and the American Way, but felt it was TOO much like an ‘80s US sitcom for my liking; I didn’t particularly like them then, so I’ll stick with the PvP crew for my pop culture yuks.

New Avengers #19
I still haven’t got round to reading the comics leading to this, so this will be a rare book that can’t be read with feverish excitement on the tube home from the comic shop. It also means I have been missing any reviews or speculation on the series so far, so I can come into it fresh. I look forward to it eventually.

Nextwave: Agents of HATE #5
This will be the first comic I pull from the bag to devour (not literally, that would be hideous, and probably poisonous), as Ellis and Immonen have created a cracking team book from the start, with plenty of gleeful laughs and cartoony violence, a perfect recipe for a superhero comic.

Powers #18
The new direction for the Powers team is very intriguing, especially when anything can happen in this creator-owned book; the status quo does not have to be maintained, as the series has shown, which provides the platform for plenty of drama and action.

Squadron Supreme #3
I didn’t buy the linking mini-series, so I might be missing some nuances, but the last issue didn’t inspire huge amounts of confidence. Without the MAX umbrella, this book now feels like a well-done but ordinary superhero book – the villain and cliffhanger at the end of #2 was so prosaic and clichéd, I felt a shiver of trepidation at where this book can go. The duo of JMS and Frank have earned some leeway, but they will have to pull out something spectacular to impress me.

X-Factor #7
With issue 7, it means it’s a new story for the next trade, so I hope things get shook up a little for the next storyline. I’m still not enamoured with Calero, especially following on from the talents of Sook, and the single-issue breathers of the last two comics haven’t been as strong. David has got the props for this book, so I’m expecting good things.


And because I didn’t tell you what I didn’t get last week:

100 Bullets #72
Azzarello. Risso. Violence. Conspiracies. Cool dialogue. Funky art. What more do you need?

Fell #5
One of the best new comics in a while, this densely packed 'detective television show as comic book' will be my next book, after Nextwave, with Ellis’s precision dialogue and Templesmith’s moody and evocative art. I’m amazed it hasn’t been picked up as a television show.

Jack Staff #10
The last issue came out in October of last year, I think, so this is quite a wait. I don’t know if it’s the drag or the anthology nature of the book, but my love for the book has been waning. I hope that Grist can do something special to return me to the fold.

Tuesday, 23 May 2006

Film review - Mission: Impossible III


The Mission: Impossible film franchise is not really Mission: Impossible. It is the 'Tom Cruise does spy stuff and explosions' franchise. The television series was a real ensemble piece, with Peter Graves providing a regular leader. The films have changed it so that Ethan Hunt is the star, and the story is all about him.

The first film had some lovely set pieces, even if De Palma nicked them from other sources, as his is MO. The second film was a mess, but a beautifully filmed mess, with lots of lovely Woo visuals, but a flimsy story that wasn’t very Mission: Impossible, and used the mask trick WAY too much. The third film is an entirely different beast, but it is the Tom Cruise show again, which seems a criminal waste of one of the greatest theme tunes in the world.

The film starts in media res; Phillip Seymour Hoffman is holding a gun to a woman’s head, who we know is Cruise’s girl from the trailers. He threatens Cruise and ends up shooting her in the head, leading to the credits. Now, this is a nice idea; grab the audience’s attention and have some fun. However, there is no way that they are going to shoot Cruise’s girl in the head in a mainstream blockbuster, so you know that it’s a false cliffhanger.

The film then reveals the story up to that point; Ethan Hunt is no longer in the field, and is in love with his new girl (Michelle Monaghan), lying that he works for the Department of Transport. He gets called into a rescue mission for an operative he trained, who was caught by Hoffman. She dies, and Cruise gets back into the game, catching Hoffman, only for him to escape and go after the woman. The killing of the love interest is usually the start of a duff revenge film starring Jean Claude van Damme, so the cliché is a little worn, but JJ Abrams is aware of it and doesn’t fall into the traps.

Talking of Abrams, I have to confess that he was the main reason for my interest in the film. I know he must have put up with Cruise wanting this to be a personal story for his character (again, completely missing the point of the Mission: Impossible idea, but never mind), but I’m glad he did, just to see what he does with a big budget action flick. The problem he sets himself is that we know where the story is leading for the first two-thirds of the film, so he had better make it interesting. And the action pieces are very nicely done, exciting, dramatic, well shot and worth the price of admission. He puts in nods to the first two films, with Cruise dropping to his Superman-on-a-rope pose, and the use of the masks, without being slavish, and he keeps things moving. This bodes well for the future, even if this film isn’t brilliant.

In the acting stakes, you have to put up with Cruise a lot, but that’s an unfortunate side-effect of the franchise. Monaghan comes across as something more than the token love interest, even if they overplay it in the final set piece. The other actors don’t get much in the way of screen time, which is a shame for Ving Rhames, but not so much for Jonathan Rhys Meyers (why does he get so much work? He is not pretty and his voice and acting is rather annoying). Hoffman is wasted in the role of bad guy, but he puts in some nice menacing looks. Simon Pegg gets the best cameo, bringing a smile to my face for his silly bit of nonsense. Lawrence Fishburne has fun in a role that he fits rather well, but Billy Crudup looks out of place in his stab for the mainstream, which is a shame for such a good actor.

If you like a blockbuster that is well done but doesn’t leave much taste on the palate, then this is the film for you. It’s inoffensive and enjoyable, to a degree, with everything you would expect from the franchise. However, I wouldn’t say the future is particularly wonderful for Cruise’s pet project.

Rating: VID

Monday, 22 May 2006

Dr Who, Feel The Force and some links

Stop hounding me for content, you fiends!

(I wish.)

I couldn’t get to the comic shop this week, because I was donating my kidneys, spleen, pancreas, liver, lungs and heart to poor sick children, or something, so no comic reviews from me today. Go search the lovely blogosphere if that is what your heart desires.

While recovering from impossibly saintly organ donation, I watched the second part of the Cybermen story in Dr Who. This has definitely been the weakest so far: it was stretched to fill two episodes, just so we could have the cool cliffhanger of old; Roger Lloyd-Pack was hamming it something chronic as the villain; the emotional scene between Rose and Mickey at the end was let down by the fact that they can’t act; and the whole thing kept on reminding me of Buffy. I’m not saying that Buffy is the origins of all good fantasy/sci-fi television, but it is certainly the role model for the new Dr Who, in its approach and attitude. The recent story set in the school, which had wonderfully emotive and resonant aspect of the Sarah Jane plot, had a main plot that felt like an unused idea from Buffy. It wasn’t helped by having Anthony Head in it. Then, the Cybermen story felt like it was a two-episode attempt to justify Mickey in the vein of the Zeppo episode of Buffy, where Xander finds some self-respect among the people with powers. Ah well, hope they have something better next week.

Talking about television, I meant to mention Feel The Force.

I try to sample new British comedy. Sometimes it is good, sometimes it is poor. And sometimes it is rubbish, like BBC2’s Feel The Force, about two inept women in the police. It makes The Thin Blue Line look like a work of genius.

Michelle Gomez from Green Wing and 'I. Want. A. Fucking. Baby!' woman from ManStrokeWoman are the two crap coppers in question. The former wants to be a good cop but isn’t, while the latter is genuinely useless and is looking for a man. Together they are a comedy black hole, sucking in the laughter and making you feel slightly sad.

I have to confess to laughing once, but it was a fart joke, and I am a heterosexual man, so it’s genetic that I find that funny.

The BBC must be rather desperate if they produced this drivel, just because it was written by a former writer from the Smack The Pony team, who has turned a sketch into a 30-minute sitcom by chucking in the hilarity of murdered people. Flimsy would be a compliment.

The most memorable thing about the whole venture? The theme song. 'Whoo oo oo ooo Can you feel the force?' I couldn’t get the bloody tune out of my head for a week …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, some link dumping.

I can’t believe there is going to be a Public Enemy comic. The revolution will not be televised, it will be represented in four colours and grids. Hopefully, it will have a whole lot of Flava, booooyyyyyyyy

I’ve never tried the darling of the blogosphere, Scott Pilgrim, so I can enjoy a free comic at Newsarama. I haven’t made up my mind about it, but it looks okay.

Inspired by Andrew Wheeler’s post about the top 50 Marvel characters, the Great Curve are going for the top 50 DC characters, with other bloggers getting in on the act. Sounds interesting, even though I am not sufficiently geeky to be able to join in, being an infrequent visitor to the DCU. Still, I look forward to the result.

Friday, 19 May 2006

Q&A: Invisible Woman

Susan Richards, nee Storm, is a mother of two, Franklin and Valeria, wife to noted scientist Reed Richards, and a founding member of the Fantastic Four. She has the ability to turn invisible, as well as project invisible force fields. With Reed, Johnny and Ben, she has saved the world and the universe countless times.

What is your idea of perfect happiness?
My family. And no imminent threat of death.

What is your greatest fear?
Being useless.

Which living person do you most admire and why?
My husband, Reed Richards, who constantly proves he deserves his code name, as a husband, father and friend.

What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
Malice.

What is the trait you most deplore in others?
Hating children.

What has been your most embarrassing moment?
See the answer to question 4.

What vehicles do you own?
Fantasticar (my name is on the registration for tax purposes).

What is your greatest extravagance?
A skyscraper in the middle of Manhattan.

What is your most treasured possession?
My children.

What do you most dislike about your appearance?
I'm not bragging by saying 'nothing'; you have to believe you look good to go running around in spandex. I work out to keep in shape, especially after giving birth, so I'm proud. Anyway, I've always got the invisibility as a back-up.

Who would play you in a movie of your life?
NOT Jessica Alba.

What is your most unappealing habit?
Berating my younger brother, Johnny, even when he deserves it.

What is your favourite smell?
My invisible force fields.

What is your fancy dress costume of choice?
When you can turn invisilbe, fancy dress really isn't worth it.

To whom would you most like to say sorry and why?
Namor, for stringing him along all this time.

What or who is the greatest love of your life?
Reed is my centre, my rock, my light.

Which living person do you most despise and why?
Victor von Doom, because he is the anti-Reed, and it's such a shame.

Have you ever said 'I love you' without meaning it?
Never. And anything Namor says is a lie.

When did you last cry, and why?
I cry all the time; male writers only know one emotion for women, and it involves tears.

What keeps you awake at night?
The sound of Reed's involuntary stretching; it's exactly like in the cartoon and I'm still not used to it in the middle of the night.

How would you like to be remembered?
As a good wife and mother.

What is the most important lesson life has taught you?
Appearances can be deceiving.

Thursday, 18 May 2006

David Artists-Just-Outside-My-Favourites (Part 2)

Following from the previous post, this is the second part in my list of artists I dig but who are just outside my Top 5 (in continuing alphabetical order):

Keown HulkDale Keown
Peter David had a great run on the Incredible Hulk; not completely perfect by any means, but pretty damned good, it has to be said. It was made even better with artists who had a little something extra. Keown was such an artist for me, and his run on the Hulk came at the zenith of PAD’s run on the Hulk, leading up to the unification of the three personas. Keown could take it to extremes, but in a cartoony and appropriate manner, but he was also very good at drawing expressions in the talky parts, with an almost Maguire-esque ability with faces in comedy. I used to love the way his characters would have drool between their teeth when shouting; I’m weird like that. Even though he had a basis that could almost qualify as a Byrne clone, he bought an extra edge and freshness to his art that Byrne lost a long time ago. I even bought PITT, his creator-owned series from Image, which goes to show the impact he had. Shame he went off to try and become a rock star.

Lee X-MenJim Lee
When Lee did his first work on the Uncanny X-Men, I was wowed. It was just so cool. And I wanted more. Fortunately, I got more, although not enough as he went to start Image and do his own thing. I didn’t buy WildCATS (although I have a few issues dotted here and there) because I had heard that Claremont had been removed from the X-Men because the editors had wanted the superstar artists in charge, and I felt some loyalty to Claremont over Lee, even though I thought he was an almost perfect superhero artist. His mix of beautiful people, hard bodies, poses and movement were so appropriate for the time and place that I always associate him with the X-Men. I still like his art, even though it won’t buy just because it exists; I did buy his own series, Divine Right, while he was writing it (which was surprisingly good, in my opinion), which goes to show my affiliation for his work.

Maguire Justice LeagueKevin Maguire
I don’t know if Maguire feels stereotyped as the ‘Funny Superheroes’ artist, but his work is the best mix of superhero action and the exquisite detail of facial reactions required for good comedy that I have yet seen. Would the Giffen–DeMatteis run on Justice League been as funny without his art? I don’t think it would, as his fantastic art worked perfectly with the mood. I remember getting the Captain America year one series that he did with Nicieza, just because of his art, because I really don’t get Captain America, and thinking he could do the serious stuff as well. This was born out with the emotional weight of the most recent sequel to the Bwa-Ha-Ha days, in the Guy/Bea/Tora scene. I even bought Strikeback and Trinity Angels, such is my admiration for his art. I’ve yet to get The Defenders, but I can’t wait.

PachecoCarlos Pacheco
The clean, dynamic art of a European who loves superheroes has always been a joy to behold. It was probably Warren Ellis’s Starjammers that first caught my eye, but with art that splendid, it wasn’t difficult. There is a lean, detailed, muscular beauty to his work, with the highlights (for me) of Avengers Forever and Arrowsmith. I’m not a big Jeph Loeb or Geoff Johns fan, so I haven’t got a lot of his recent stuff (and the reason why I stopped buying his run on the Fantastic Four as well), but Pacheco on art is a guarantee of gorgeous work.



Pearson Body BagsJason Pearson
The funky, angular, cartoony stylings of Pearson first caught my attention in the Giffen ‘Five Years Later’ LSH. It could have been just the change after the moody Giffen art, but it was also because it has a fresh energy of its own, fizzling with movement and an edge. The most easily enjoyable work was the John Woo-inspired Savage Dragon story, Blood and Guts, but it's Body Bags that is the closest to Pearson’s heart and home, with a bleakly funny take on a bounty hunter and his sassy daughter. I was very happy that Jason brought that back to us; it was more comfortable buying that than the Penthouse Comix he did (even though the story he did was incredibly sexy, I must confess).

YuLeinil Yu
Another artist I discovered via a Warren Ellis-written story, this time Wolverine, where Yu’s classic yet modern style just oozed off the pages and smothered my eyes in their gorgeousness. Despite not liking Lobdell, I still bought High Roads because of his sleak, snazzy visuals. His line has a very unique feel to it, with some nice touches and strong storytelling element. His Superman: Birthright was a very modern interpretation of Supes that I enjoyed, and I’m debating whether to get Silent Dragon, based on so-so reviews on the blogosphere. I might even pick up the trade of the Ultimate Hulk/Wolverine thing, just because of his sterling work.

That's the list of pencil jockeys who float my boat, but don't qualify for the David Top 5 favourite artists, coming soon.

Wednesday, 17 May 2006

Marvel & Image solicitations

Is it really a year since the first Ultimate annuals? Are they special anymore, or just money-grabbing opportunities (or is that stating the obvious when it comes to Marvel)? I must rest my weary cynicism detector.

Reading the Marvel solicits is slightly tiring; if it isn’t a tie-in to the massive Civil War crossover, then it’s probably a new comic that nobody really wants (Annihilation: The Nova Corps Files? Claws? Heroes for Hire?), or a bizarre collection (Spider-Man Family: Amazing Friends? Marvel Milestones: Chris Claremont & Jim Lee – X-Men & The Starjammers Part 1 [reprinting Uncanny X-Men #275]?). It’s exhausting.

AXM#16Things I like – the title of the latest Runaways arc, 'Dead Means Dead' is funny; the cover for She-Hulk #11, even if it is by Greg Horn; the cover for Astonishing X-Men #16 speaks to my inner geek; the funny cover to Exiles #85; the title of the Nextwave hardcover collection, 'This Is What They Want'; that they are reprinting the Untold Tales of Spider-man, even if the prices don’t correlate (8 issues of 99 cents should be less than $19.99, shouldn’t it?).

Is it me, or does the line 'Do NOT miss out on this issue!' for Wolverine: Origins #5 just scream of desperation? Wouldn’t it be simpler to put, 'PLEASE BUY ME! PLEASE!'?

Wow, I couldn’t even summon the energy for excessive Marvel mockery; it’s more depressing than I thought. If you love huge crossovers that make you buy books you don’t buy, then make yours Marvel this month. Otherwise, move along, nothing to see here …

------------------------------------

Image solicitations for August

There’s not usually enough Image interest to do an entire post, so here are just a few mentions because the Marvel books were so uninspiring.

Bomb Queen

Special mention for fanboy pleasing to the cover of Bomb Queen vs Blacklight (one-shot). Why not just go straight to Eros for your porn comics, hmm?




Liberty Meadows T-shirt
Talking of which, here’s the Liberty Meadows T-shirt: Frank Cho certainly knows his audience …

Top Cow again produce another thumping collection – the first 50 issues of Tomb Raider for $49.99. I don’t know why they are doing it, but good luck to them for the sheer madness of it.

Best of FinchAlthough Image try to get away from the, well, image of young men drawing hot chicks they masturbate to, we will always have reminders, such as Best of Dave Finch TP, with all the nipple-pointing, short skirt for no reason, pouting action you could want.

As I can find nothing else to point out, I should include my obligatory heads up on Fell, which is very good indeed. But you already knew that.

Tuesday, 16 May 2006

Film review: Brick

Brick

The American high school seems to be the versatile and fertile ground for re-imagining old stories and styles for a new look: Clueless was Emma with Valley speak; 10 Things I Hate about You was The Taming of the Shrew; She’s All That was a low quality Pygmalion; The Faculty was Invasion of the Body Snatchers meets The Breakfast Club; Sky High was a rom-com with superheroes; Bring It On was about the empowerment of women in … okay, I can’t defend that one. Still, the mouldability of teens allows for a great variety of storytelling. Which brings us to Brick.

Brick is a hard-boiled noir set in a high school. That’s a ‘high concept’ pitch if ever I heard one, and it could so easily be a disaster. The only way for it to work, and the route that Brick takes, is to go all in and take it seriously. This isn’t a film that winks at the audience or borrows some tropes for the sake of it; this is an archetypal noir story – with a focused, determined central protagonist who gets punched a lot, a Mr Big, a MacGuffin to keep things rolling, a femme fatale and hard-boiled dialogue – that is true to its roots all the way down, even though it is set at school.

Brick stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Brendan, a loner in the world of jock and geek cliques, trying to uncover the mystery of the disappearance of his ex-girlfriend, Emily. With the help of his friend, The Brain, he works his way into the employ of the local Mr Big, The Pin, after withstanding a beating from The Pin’s henchman, Tugger. When The Pin and Tugger find out that Emily is dead, things turn bleak …

Rian Johnson has written and directed a great little film. The integrity of the film is maintained throughout, as the noir element pervades every aspect of it, from the story, the characters, the moody and evocative score and the great dialogue, which filters the pulp poetry of Chandler, Hamnet and Thompson into a modern vein without losing meaning or its unique voice. Film magazines were publishing mini-dictionaries to help with the lingo prior to the film coming out, presumably part of the press package, giving the film a distinct flavour. Gordon-Levitt is great as our stubborn, one-track punchbag of a paladin, remaining blinkered on his quest for truth, even when things look dark. A very enjoyable film, and worthy of its Sundance Special Jury prize.

Rating: DAVE

Monday, 15 May 2006

DC August solicitations

No intro. Let's do it.

Much as I like a bit of Wagner, I won’t be getting his Batman Year 1.5 stories. However, Batman and the Mad Monk is wonderfully silly title, and he draws a cool Bats.

What a great byline: 'What do you get when you add one Batman, fifty Ninja Man-Bats and the British Prime Minister's wife?' Grant Morrison on Batman is a beautiful thing.

52 weeks – Lobo? Really? Lobo? Wow … I mean, even with Giffen on board, it’s still Lobo.

JLA Classified #26 sees a 5-parter from Peter Milligan – does he only do mainstream stuff now? Did he give up after Human Target was cancelled? Shame if it is.

Justice League of America gets yet another restart. For the big guns of DC, how many times has this series been revamped? That’s not exactly inspiring. Why can’t they seem to get it right?

JusticeI’m not reading Justice, which seems to be Alex Ross saying, 'This is the way things should be, so yah boo sucks to you', but does Ross think that all his covers are iconic classics? Does he only do static poses of classic heroes? That seems a little limited …

Is there a pool on how long the new Martian Manhunter series will last? Do people love J’onn J’onnz enough again? I don’t think so, and I quite liked Ostrander’s series.

Solo#12Big shout out for Solo #12, presenting the bizarre and warped art of Brendan McCarthy. A man who sees the world through an hallucinogenic eye, without the need for drugs.

For some reason, seeing the title, Trials of Shazam, makes me think of the lawsuit the original DC had against the original publishers of Captain Marvel.

The new addition to my pull list has to be The Boys by Garth Ennis and Darick Robertson, which looks like it will be a whole lot of fun from two top talents. Bring on the comedy/violence/sickness/superhero-mocking.

Bite Club: VCUVertigo has some great covers, from 100 Bullets #75 & Bite Club: VCU #5, meaning James Jean doesn’t win the cover of the month award.

I finally get to read the end of The Losers, the excellent series by Diggle & Jock, as the Endgame collects the last issues. I have been studiously avoiding reviews of the series, so I can’t wait for this.

Power Girl BustThe final comedy mention goes to the Power Girl Bust. Firstly, having a line called WOMEN OF THE DC UNIVERSE BUSTS is simply hysterical; I mean, do you say it with the tongue in cheek, or were they seriously expecting irony-free announcement of that? Secondly, the Bust itself is spectacular, in both senses of the phrase, as it is firstly unbelievable, and because it brings a Adam Hughes figure into three dimensions, the third dimension being particularly important. Hilarious.

Friday, 12 May 2006

From A Library - At Death's Door, Batman/Deathblow, Road To Perdition

At Death's DoorDeath: At Death’s Door
By Jill Thompson

During the Sandman: Season of Mists arc, Death finds her home invaded with the souls of the dead, so enlists the help of her sisters, Delirium and Despair, to find the missing souls. Delirium helps by throwing a party in Death’s home. This is enjoyably cute, but it is so cross-referenced and intertwined with the Sandman storyline that it makes you wonder what the point of the whole thing is. This is a fluffy nothingness of a story, with an American Manga style that gets on the nerves after a while and which doesn’t add anything to the original storyline.


Batman DeathblowBatman/Deathblow: After The Fire
By Brian Azzarello and Lee Bermejo

This book probably has testosterone implanted in the pages; the Azzarello dialogue and the Bermejo art is all about being manly, in a manly way. I felt I should be chewing glass while beer was pumped directly into my veins, in order to be at my most masculine. The story, involving government spooks and associated double-dealing shenanigans, plays to Azzarello’s strengths, while the design element of Bermejo, with his hard angles and muscular posturing (like a slicker Simon Bisley, but better), played well to the feel of the piece. I can barely remember it after reading it, but it was enjoyable fluff during it.


Road To PerditionRoad To Peridition
By Max Allan Collins and Richard Piers Rayner

I enjoyed the film, so I was curious to read the source material. The essence is the same, but the graphic novel is a much rawer, more-violent, more-masculine work. Collins put in a lot of research to get the period right, but not nearly as much as Rayner, who reportedly took 4 years to finish the book. It shows, as his art is detailed and exquisite, bringing the blood and reality to life, while still telling the story. It’s an odd sensation, reading this after the film, as the echoes of the adaptation linger, almost forcing you to compare the two. Sam Mendes made it more emotional, comparing the father–son relationships, whereas Collins is more interested in the brutal reality of the piece. Each stand up on their own, and both are equally rewarding, only in different ways.

Thursday, 11 May 2006

Creator with most comics in my collection

This might be a little nerdy; it’s hard to tell when one is so close to it. But I like cataloguing my comic book collection. I like having the list, including author, artist(s), company, imprint. It might be a bit sad, but I don’t care.

It means that I can examine my collection and revel in its numbers and order. And, no, I’m not an accountant.

It also means that I can provide a countdown of the creators responsible for the greatest number of comics in my collection.

I tend to be story based, so the main people are going to be writers. I have favourite artists, a topic I am trying to finish posting about, but they don’t have the pull of a good storyteller for me. Just outside of the top ten, we have Peter Mililgan, Greg Rucka, John Ostrander, Stan Sakai and James Robinson. Milligan is there mostly due to Shade, The Changing Man; Rucka has Queen & Country, some Detective Comics, Gotham Central; Ostrander fills up with Suicide Squad and The Spectre; Sakai is there by Usagi Yojimbo alone, which should earn him special praise; and Robinson gets close (losing by one comic) due to Starman, Firearm, Leave it to Chance and some WildCATS issues, and assorted singles. So, who is in the top ten?

10. Mark Millar – 173
After a slow start, co-writing with Grant Morrison on the likes of Aztek and The Flash (each comic is attributed to both writers separately, so the figures don’t add up, but this is my collection and my rules, so shut up), but running up through the ranks with his great run on Swamp Thing, The Authority, Ultimate X-Men and, of course, The Ultimates.

9. Priest – 186
I don’t recall when I got the Priest habit (if you’ll pardon the pun), but it seems I got it bad, as a large number of his books have made their way into my collection. His incredibly enjoyable run on Black Panther makes up the bulk, with the rest of the cancelled-too-soon books: Xero, Quantum & Woody, The Crew, Deadpool … A great talent deserving of more work and recognition.

8. John Byrne – 196
A surprise to see the current villain of the internet in my list. It seems strange to remember a time when he produced good comics rather than inflammatory remarks about Jessica Alba. I haven’t read his Namor or West Coast Avengers in a while, but I enjoyed them at the time, but his Next Men and especially his Fantastic Four run are worthy entrants to anybody’s collection, and I have a soft spot for his Sensational She-Hulk, back when he actually knew how to be funny.

7. Brian Michael Bendis – 226
I don’t recall if it was the internet or Warren Ellis, but I’m glad they switched me onto Bendis. Jinx and Goldfish were great discoveries of the world of Bendis conversation, and his Fortune & Glory is simply hilarious and mandatory reading for anyone interested in Hollywood. His high showing for a recent entry into ‘Writer-I-Like’ status is due to pumping out some long runs on good comics: Sam & Twitch, Alias, Daredevil and Powers are all excellent reads, with intriguing characters in dramatically interesting situations, drawn in wonderfully moody styles. He may be ubiquitous in the current Marvel output, but that doesn’t detract from his body of work.

6. Peter David – 224
The Incredible Hulk under the pen of PAD was a delight. It wasn’t all brilliant; the Joe Fixit stories I found hit and miss, and Liam Sharpe dragged the series down after the great stretch of the Keown and Frank issues, which were the crème de la crème of the series, but here was a book that was intelligent and funny and not afraid to do powerful and startling changes to a major Marvel character. So, issues #340–467 (minus some non-PAD written issues, but plus annuals & one-offs) account for the bulk of books PAD is responsible for. I also have his Spider-man 2099 and X-Factor (both series) and I used to have more by him prior to a purge – Supergirl with Gary Frank, Aquaman – that is perhaps too flattering towards his, for me, unevenness as a writer. Still, gotta love his Hulk, particularly for Rick Jones, the funniest character in the Marvel U.

5. Alan Moore – 250
Like many others, I was blown away by Watchmen, and sought Moore comics (ho, ho) wherever I could, including Swamp Thing, which is the longest run of a single book. Most of his work is in finite series, which makes the high placing even more impressive: League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, Top Ten, Promethea, Tom Strong, Supreme, 1963, Smax, V for Vendetta, Miracleman … For my money, the greatest writer of comic books, bar none (even if he did work for Rob Liefeld for a while), and it’s a crime to see his work butchered by Hollywood, but we will always have the untouched genius in the comics themselves, so it’s not all bad.

4. Garth Ennis – 296
The bizarre mix of raw, in-your-face storytelling with tenderness from Ennis has been charming me since Hellblazer. Prolific yet never pedestrian, Ennis is an amazing writer, able to produce personal epics (Preacher), mainstream-ish epics (Hitman), excellent mini-series (Unknown Soldier, Born, Fury, 303), and still redefine a worn-out Marvel character in the Punisher. He can write conversations or action, the fantastical or the reality of war, he can write funny or emotional, and he keeps up the quality, which is remarkable.

3. Grant Morrison – 305
The mad, comic book sex god of writing, Morrison got his story hooks in me early on, when I first read Zenith in 2000AD. His explosion on the American comic book scene produced some brilliant work (Animal Man, Doom Patrol, Flex Mentallo), and things have never been the same since. From Arkham Asylum to the personal world of The Invisibles, from turning Oscar Wilde into an action hero in Sebastian O to refining and reinvigorating major franchises of the Big Two (JLA and New X-Men), and still producing his wonderfully quirky little bits of Morrison (Vimanarama, We3) before taking on the absurdly ambitious maxi-series where the team doesn’t meet (Seven Soldiers). He is a phenomenon.

2. Warren Ellis – 317
My disturbed devotion to the internet Jesus, apart from constantly posting about his output, should be obvious from his placing in the list of authors with most books in my collection. The simple fact is that his books connect with my sensibilities more than other authors, and his books are nearly always the sort of stories I want to read. He constantly tries new things and searches out new avenues, he talks openly about his craft in a refreshing manner, and he produces a lot of quality with quality artists. Currently, there’s Desolation Jones, Fell, Planetary and Nextwave; but the bulk winner is his masterpiece, Transmetropolitan. That doesn’t mention the rest of his output; The Authority, or Stormwatch, to his Marvel stuff (Excalibur, Wolverine, Thor, Druid, Hellstorm, Doom 2099, Ultimate Fantastic Four), his pop singles (Red, Reload, Mek, Ministry of Space, Two-Step), or his creator work with smaller publishers, like Scars or the Apparat line. And still I keep buying his work.

And who is at number one, in a list that has Alan Moore, Garth Ennis, Grant Morrison and Warren Ellis in the top five?

1. Chris Claremont – 352
Guess which comic book series got me into the world of comic books?
Yes, I was an X-Men junkie and proud of it. Ever since my first taste of Claremont’s mutants, I was hooked. The characters, the story, the themes, all connected to my isolated teenage self, and were everything I wanted from a comic book at the time. The Uncanny X-Men and the New Mutants hold a special place in my heart that can never be moved, even with all Claremont’s faults. So, basically, if it is an X-book, and Claremont wrote it, I tried to get my grubby hands on it: The Uncanny X-Men (and Classic X-Men, with the back-ups drawn by John Bolton, helping me to read comics that I wouldn’t be able to afford), the New Mutants (I carried on with the Louise Simonson run and, God help me, the Liefeld run, but they are no longer part of the collection), the assorted annuals, specials and mini-series, Excalibur and the first ten issues of the original Wolverine solo title. Obviously, I bought a warehouse full of other mutant comics over the years, before having my eyes opened to other things (which have subsequently been donated to a children’s ward in a local hospital about 6 years back), but these comics cannot be replaced or removed, as they form the basis of my comic book experience, whatever that might say about me.

Wednesday, 10 May 2006

David's Artists-Just-Outside-My-Favourites (Part 1)

I mentioned the fact I would be talking about the artists I enjoy, so here is the first part of the preliminary rounds – the artists I dig but who are just outside the Top 5 list of my all-time favourite artists. In alphabetical order, here are the first six in the category of Cool Artists:

CassadayJohn Cassasday
For his Planetary work alone, Cassaday has earned a place on my list of artists whose work I love. I even bought the X-MenAlpha Flight mini he did with Ben Raab, solely because of his eye-poppingly gorgeous art. An absolute joy to behold, he makes any work he touches even better, his sense of story is immaculate, his design is phenomenal and there is an innate coolness to everything he draws. A serious contender for a future Top 5 artist, once he has got more of a body of work under his belt.




CharestTravis Charest
The beautiful, slick, exquisite penmanship of Charest just sets of my visual pleasure sensors to overload. I even bought the pointless, Lobdell-written Wildcats, just to ogle the delightful art and swim in the sensuous beauty of it. I remember the story about Grant Morrison, sick to the point of hospitalisation, being given a batch of comics by Mark Millar, including the latest WildCATS when Moore was writing it. 'Is it drawn by Charest?' he was heard to ask, which goes to show the level of admiration his work can inspire.



ChaykinHoward Chaykin
One of the defining moments in my maturation in comic book taste beyond just superhero was the discovery of a British reprint of Howard Chaykin’s reimagining of The Shadow ('Blood & Judgement'); it was just astounding, to me, with the mix of sex and violence and the unique and dazzling art style. Everything he drew just looked sexier, cooler and snazzier, and that hasn’t changed in all his work, from his signature piece, American Flagg!, through his porn masterpiece, Black Kiss, and his various superhero work, such as Midnight Men and Power & Glory. I’m very happy he’s coming back to the drawing board again.


DillonSteve Dillon
I first saw Dillon’s expressive art and clean lines in the pages of 2000AD, and he was good then, and he’s only got better. He will always be linked with Garth Ennis, and Preacher and Hellblazer, and his Punisher was hilariously funny, and I was really tempted to get the superhero work he has been doing with Daniel Way, just because it is Dillon. He draws talking heads, action scenes, emotional scenes, funny scenes, everything; and he does it without drawing attention to his superlative work and tells the story perfectly. I hope his increased presence on the scene gets him more money, as he deserves it.


FrankGary Frank
I don’t recall if I had seen Gary’s art prior to his run on the Incredible Hulk with Peter David, but it became an instant favourite, especially coming so soon after Dale Keown’s run, which I think of as the pinnacle of the David run on the character. His classic superhero physiques, solid storytelling, as well as his facial expressions, matched with a strong, slick line, mean his work will always be a draw for me. He has developed a great working relationship with JMS, with Midnight Nation perhaps being the strongest collaboration, and he had a fair crack at writing for himself too, in the rather good Kin.


HitchBryan Hitch
Hitch started out as an Alan Davis clone, but most artists start somewhere and then progress. And, boy, has he progressed. He started well on the second season of Storwatch, then blew the comic book apart with his widescreen magic on The Authority. With The Ultimates, he is now one of the definitive superhero artists currently working in the field, each issue a visual delight. Strong vision matched to pitch-perfect penmanship and storytelling, with an eye for the stunning image, he has it all. Long may it last.

Tuesday, 9 May 2006

Film review: Confetti


The main reason for seeing Confetti, for me, was not just the fact that it was a British film and a comedy, but for the people in it. Have you got your scorecard ready?

  • Jessica Stephenson (Spaced)
  • Martin Freeman (The Office, The Robinsons)
  • Robert Webb (Peep Show)
  • Olivia Coleman (Peep Show, Green Wing)
  • Stephen Mangan (Green Wing, episode of I’m Alan Partridge – “Dan! Dan! Dan! Dan!”)
  • Meredith MacNeill (Man Stroke Woman, episode of Peep Show)
  • Felicia Montague (I’m Alan Partridge, Nighty Night)
  • Mark Heap (Spaced, Green Wing)
  • Julia Davis (Nighty Night, episode of I’m Alan Partridge)

Do you see? I like British comedy (the good stuff, obviously). I like the people who make the good stuff, and a lot of them are in the same film. Also, they were improvising in their scenes. Ergo, this should be fun. I was wrong.

The film sees a bridal magazine (run by Montague, owned by Jimmy Carr’s character) select three couples for their original weddings – musical (Stephenson & Freeman), tennis-themed (Mangan & MacNeill) and naturalist (Webb & Coleman) – and help them prepare it in three months with the aid of wedding organisers, who happen to be a gay couple. This is all filmed in a documentary style, with the actors improvising the majority of their dialogue. However, the film tries to place the improv into a structure where it has its cake and eats it, by mocking the fuss of weddings and then having the emotionally dramatic weddings at the end.

It doesn’t help that the central target of the comedy is not sufficiently large or inherently funny. Are they ridiculing weddings, magazines about weddings, the industry as a whole, the people who want big weddings or what? This leads to a lack of focus for the comedy; compare this with the quality of the Christopher Guest-directed Best in Show or The Mighty Wind and it’s embarrassing. The latter know what they are doing, whereas Confetti flounders.

The small character moments between some of the characters are good, such as between the Stephenson and Freeman characters, but these are few and far between. The film lacks the exactness of The Office or the controlled improv of Mike Leigh, falling somewhere in middle with neither of the benefits.

The most excruciating factor was the audience finding the campest wedding organiser the funniest thing in the movie, and bear in mind I watched this in the Clapham Picturehouse; I felt like I was watching Are You Being Served? with my parents laughing hysterically at the mincing antics of John Inman. It was so embarrassing. I can only assume that the audience mostly contained fag hags, because it was not funny, just lame. Bizarrely, the straighter of the two was one of the strongest characters and better performances.

The whole things crashes into obviousness at the end, with the most transparent wedding winning, even though I thought the tennis theme was more interesting. I wanted this to be so funny, but I came away feeling quite disappointed. The director/writer (or whatever title is perhaps more appropriate) Debbie Isitt might have had an good original idea, but failed in the execution.

Rating: DA

Monday, 8 May 2006

No comics, no content

Usually, I don’t have comics to review because I can’t get to my shop to buy them. This week, I didn’t have anything to buy. At all. This is depressing because I love comics, but it’s positive because it means I don’t have spend money. I didn’t buy Civil War in the end; the reviews I have read seem to agree that the book is okay, well written and well drawn, but not much else. I suppose it depends on how much one has invested in the Marvel Universe. I don’t have enough, and that’s fine with me.

I still haven’t sorted out the new place after the move (the computer still needs unpacking), so no real content for the moment. So let us talk about other things.

It was Free Comic Book Day over the weekend, but it has never been much of an event for me, especially here in the UK. Personally, I think that comic shops here simply don't get that much casual browsing. The shops tend to be small and out of the way or, if they are large like London’s Forbidden Planet, they are more likely to be merchandise shops, with comics in the basements (along with books and DVDs). Comics are simply TOO EXPENSIVE to become a regular purchase for the elusive mainstream audience; the sort of entertainment that comics provide for the vast majority of people are more readily (and freely) available in television series or in film. I cannot see this changing – an average of £2.00 for a comic book is not an impulse buy, and the prices will only increase in the future.

Talking of comic book value for money, there is a preview of Casanova at Newsarama. It looks very good, but I don’t understand the concept of making available nearly half the content of the story online; your mileage may vary.

In the area of ‘Comic books I won’t be buying but admire the ambition’, DC’s 52 Week series has its own website, which is very snazzy and professionally done. I’m very happy to see them make the effort, and it would be almost enough to make me think about buying it, if I cared in the slightest about the minor universe tweaking it represents.

Greg finishes his huge post about magnum opera, which has been a very interesting piece. I’m particularly delighted to see that there is an image of Usagi Yojimbo in there; I’m sure it is there solely at my badgering. I posted some thoughts on it before, and the way that it is part of my mindset at the moment, of what comics I want to keep in my collection and my buying habits. It also got me thinking about my collection and wondering who has written (or drawn) the most comics in it. Because I’m weird like that. I’ll have to look into that (via the geeky spreadsheet I have) and post the results.

Finally, congratulations to Jonah at CBR on their 10-year anniversary. As my recent post mentioned, it’s my go-to news site for comic book news, so I’m very happy for them on reaching such a huge milestone in web terms, and wish them many more years continued success.

Friday, 5 May 2006

Work kills, links feed ... oh, and something about artists

Wow, work just came out of nowhere and bit me in the arse. Bastard. How am I supposed to blog if I have to earn a living? So, first some linkblogging, then some thoughts on artists.

Scott at Polite Dissent is back. Seems there was a problem with his hosting service, which has been sorted. Good news.

Tom presents a very well-reasoned look at the two-faced nature of Joe Quesada when it comes to Spider-Man. Makes a lot of sense to me, especially as Joey Q will let JMS and Kevin Smith do whatever they want and then turn around and say that Peter Parker being married doesn’t work. There are no bad ideas, just bad writers, Joe.

Comic Book Galaxy are having a giveaway – you should all be made aware of this.

Happy Birthday to Mark, who has gone a bit senile in his old age, because he is giving away presents instead of receiving them. You can find out more here.

For my information, Shane is back blogging again at his exquisitely designed site.

Which reminds me that (a) I need to work out CSS and make this site look nicer and (b) I must update my sidebar of links; it’s a mess.

Dave continues to talk about X-Men, with a look at my favourite story from Grant Morrison’s run on the New X-Men, which was so amazingly perfect in its execution, characterization, story development, art and all round brilliance that the rest of the run, while wonderful, could never hope to match.

Jake has a well-supported treaty on the redundancy of Sue Storm in the beginning of the Fantastic Four (and, therefore, evidence for how awful a writer Stan Lee could be) that goes to show how much good work John Byrne did on his run with the group (yes, there was a time when Byrne did good things).

Oh, and apparently there’s a trailer for some sequel that people seem to be excited about …

------------------------------------------------------------

The recent discussion about masterpieces got me thinking about artists. I’ve always had a tendency to focus on the writing side, as the story is what really hooks me, but a great story is made even better with great art, so the hard-working artist should not be ignored. I have no training in art appreciation, so my favourite artists can be summed up in the words of the Monty Python sketch: 'I don’t know much about art, but I know what I like.' My selection is based on the comics I have read and books I have bought and the emotional weight of long runs and a set of aesthetics that even I’m not sure I can fully describe.

With this in mind, you can take whatever I say with a pinch of salt. I’m going to split up my favourite artists into three groups:
1. Artists who I really dig but aren’t on my top list.
2. Artists who are good and have made me go out and buy their stuff, even if I haven’t kept it.
3. My top five favourite artists.

Today, the first group: artists I really dig who aren’t on THE list. Let’s tackle this alphabetically.

Gene HaGene Ha
His exquisite artwork is so nice to look at, I can barely believe that it has been done with pen and ink. I like the mixing of a modern feel with sense of classical in his work, and the smooth, sleek lines. Apart from the occasional individual comic, such as a Starman or Global Frequency, it has to be his work on Top Ten, particularly The Forty Niners, that is stand out in my collection, even though I’m posting a scan of a Superman cover.




Tony HarrisTony Harris
He is in for his funky lines and cool styles on Starman. His Ex Machina is good, but the ‘young guy proving his ability’ vibe in the early Starman is just so damn good. When he wasn’t doing Starman, it just didn’t feel right. The other projects he has handled in between these two series haven’t grabbed me in the same way, hence his position on my completely biased list.




AH!Adam Hughes
He draws beautiful cheesecake, even if that isn’t what he wants to necessarily do. It just looks so good. I could fill the blog with the multitude of covers he has done, which start at gorgeous and escalate to amazing, so it’s a shame he doesn’t do as much inside the comics. Of the most recent, the accompanying Power Girl cover just sums him up; lush, powerful, stunning, cheeky, implausible, and art that just strokes the retina and tickles the cornea. My collection has Gen13: Ordinary Heroes, the Bwa-ha-ha Justice League run, and Star Trek: Debt of Honour.



Frank QuitelyFrank Quitely
This might seem an unusual position for Quitely, as he is one of the most stunning artists working in comics at the moment. However, his attention to detail means that he hasn’t produced a sufficient body of work to make him a main contender. His unique art style, with the elongated anatomy (especially the long legs), big jaws, unusual sexuality and fantastic pop art design mean there is nobody like him, even if he isn’t perfect or a believer in deadlines. Still, my collection is richer for his stylings on Flex Mentallo (probably my favourite), All-Star Superman, New X-Men, JLA: Earth 2 and the wonderful We3.


Mike WieringoMike Wieringo
I’ve always liked the cartoony yet muscular style of Ringo. His work on the Flash with Mark Waid just worked so well, especially for one so new to the biz, and the mix of curves, a cartoon-strip relaxedness and the kinetics of superheroics was a style I’ve always looked out for ever since. The runs that help to make my collection include the Flash, his pairing with Waid again on the Fantastic Four, and his co-owned project, Tellos, which was utterly charming and enjoyable, made moreso by his pitch-perfect art for the story, mixing a child-like (not childish) quality with the soaring imagination of fantasy.

Hopefully, work next week will allow me the opportunity to talk about the next group – the artists who make me buy their stuff (but still not my ultimate favourites).

Tuesday, 2 May 2006

Whose Side Am I On? I’m On The Outside, Looking In ...

My shopping list for the week:

...................................

NOTHING!

Damn. And it’s not even a skip week. So, what is there this week that I COULD buy?

I could get the third Gotham Central trade, if I didn’t already have all the issues of a series that has been cancelled, and was screwed by DC in its turnaround time for trades in the first place.

I could buy Infinite Crisis #7, if I cared about the DC Universe the way some people do, and so I could understand what most of the internet comic book chatter is about these days. (Or make sense of this eloquent post by the returning Jim Roeg.)

I could get Y The Last Man, if I wasn’t consigned to getting it in the trade format already. Once I start in one format, I can’t make the change, dinosaur that I am.

I could buy the Sam & Twitch trade, collecting the first nine issues of Bendis’s great run on the series, if I didn’t already own the issues in question. Really good stuff, btw.

Marvel has trades I could buy if I didn’t already have the issues: the third collection of Peter David’s Hulk work is out, collecting the strange selection of The Incredible Hulk #349–354, Web of Spider-Man #44 and Fantastic Four